Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: New Kalashnikov for Russian Forces

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Wisco
    Posts
    2,279
    Feedback Score
    0
    So.... you added a few picatinny rails?...
    Dr. Carter G. Woodson, “History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.”

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,617
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hank6046 View Post
    So.... you added a few picatinny rails?...
    Same gun new furniture. Guess its similar to commando vs mk18 minus barrel length... and i dont think the commando was std issue.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Midwest Flyover Country
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    0
    I like everything about it except the AR stock. The standard steel folding stock would have a higher cheek weld and can easily be outfitted with a cheek rest. What they should have done is use the Molot style stock with the flip up cheek rest.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    4,420
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I’m surprised that the Russians (and anyone else continuing to issue modernized AKs) haven’t gone to a more SIG 551-like design - separate upper and lower with integral rigidly affixed optic rail on the upper that doesn’t require movement/removal/etc during disassembly. The removable top cover design of the AK is antiquated IMO....queue 7n6 reply in 3, 2, 1....go....
    Last edited by JoshNC; 05-10-18 at 23:39.
    SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    I’m surprised that the Russians (and anyone else continuing to issue modernized AKs) haven’t gone to a more SIG 551-like design - separate upper and lower with integral rigidly affixed optic rail on the upper that doesn’t require movement/removal/etc during disassembly. The removable top cover design of the AK is antiquated IMO....queue 7n6 reply in 3, 2, 1....go....
    As 7n6 would say, how can you demonstrate the superior reliability of the AK without the ability to open the top cover and stuff a ham sandwich into the receiver?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Midwest Flyover Country
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    I’m surprised that the Russians (and anyone else continuing to issue modernized AKs) haven’t gone to a more SIG 551-like design - separate upper and lower with integral rigidly affixed optic rail on the upper that doesn’t require movement/removal/etc during disassembly. The removable top cover design of the AK is antiquated IMO....queue 7n6 reply in 3, 2, 1....go....

    The AK's removable topcover is a survival tool.

    Steal potato, cook potato in topcover.



    Quote Originally Posted by vicious_cb View Post
    As 7n6 would say, how can you demonstrate the superior reliability of the AK without the ability to open the top cover and stuff a ham sandwich into the receiver?

    Does your favorite rifle eat ham sandwiches?

    Mine does.




    Here is an in depth video using science to prove the AK is superior.






    7n6
    Last edited by RetroRevolver77; 05-11-18 at 00:21.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,058
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 7n6 View Post
    I like everything about it except the AR stock. The standard steel folding stock would have a higher cheek weld and can easily be outfitted with a cheek rest. What they should have done is use the Molot style stock with the flip up cheek rest.
    Or half a dozen other stock options that don't require a buffer tube.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    What you guys are politely driving at is that they look like typical Ninja Boy junk, am I reading it correctly?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,450
    Feedback Score
    0
    Picatinny? How 20th Century. M-Lok my neo-commie friends.....
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Midwest Flyover Country
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Glockster View Post
    What you guys are politely driving at is that they look like typical Ninja Boy junk, am I reading it correctly?

    What they were originally going to do and what they actually did were slightly different. The AK 12 was supposed to be very modern, integrated top rail, free float barrel, ambi-selector switch, collapsible folding stock, railed handguards, suppressor adaptable, bolt hold open and bolt release if I remember correctly. Vickers actually did a segment on the proto-type. What they ended up with is a more "dumbed down" version, it does have some of those features but not all- likely due to cost for mass production. Honestly they brought their variant of the Kalashnikov up to the late 90's Polish Beryl 96 specs. Which is fine, it's not broke- it works very well, it's slightly modernized for optics and accessories but more importantly works well in their Siberian environment for some sections of the country. Plus it is easy to maintain with gloved hands, which is why they essentially will likely never go to a Westernized upper/lower style system.


    Here's the original AK 12;

    http://armamentresearch.com/differen...tion-of-ak-12/

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •