Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: US Army chooses Sig Tango6 1-6 for DMR?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    14
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    US Army chooses Sig Tango6 1-6 for DMR?

    Good for New Hampshire but I was not aware the Sig optic line was that impressive. Did I miss something?


    https://www.sigsauer.com/press-relea...arksman-rifle/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,821
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Quite a surprise to me, but I don't follow optics very well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,618
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Wild-guess: technically meets "US-made" requirement at much lower cost than other entrants. Just a guess. Their MHS entry seems to have won in part due to much lower cost than the competition.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,432
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I somehow have a feeling this won’t last long.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,279
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Hey it's waterproof down to 1 meter and has a HellFire™ electronic-illuminated reticle system what more do you want?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,314
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I have shot behind the 1-4 and I was actually very impressed by the glass quality.

    Now as far as that goes I didn’t test anything else but the glass was every bit as clear as my Razor Gen II.

    But the 320 won the army pistol and now their optics... somebody is getting a kickback somewhere.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Evergreen State
    Posts
    827
    Feedback Score
    91 (100%)
    Same form factor as the Tango6, but it will have a different reticle and will be assembled in their Oregon plant. http://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/10...arksman-rifle/
    "We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."

    - George Orwell

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,075
    Feedback Score
    0
    Heck, I didn't realize that SIG even manufactured optics. I figured they were just made for SIG by another company.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,618
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    Heck, I didn't realize that SIG even manufactured optics. I figured they were just made for SIG by another company.
    If you look at their overall line, most of them are... sourcing includes China, Philippines, and I believe Japan also. I suspect that their US operation is primarily marketing, management, and product design/planning, with a relatively small shop that assembles outsourced components into a few specific scopes. They would hardly be the only ones doing this. AFAIK none of the US makers grind their own lenses or make their raw glass, so everyone outsources to some degree. Leupold claims to do everything else in the USA.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    8
    Feedback Score
    0
    surprise to me as well I've looked through some sig optics and while they are far from the worse I've seen they aren't leupold or vortex which i prefer for the price point as well

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •