Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Is this staking enough?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,574
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Duffy View Post
    our new product (ESF, End plate, Sling adapter, Forward Controls)
    I did not see this on your website, only the B5 option. Is it available yet? Do you have a link or photo?

    Quote Originally Posted by Duffy View Post
    I'd take the wisdom and real world experience from Will and Ash over a dealer's haughty opinion any day.
    Hell ya, I don't believe half the shit I've heard come out of some dealer's mouths.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Prototype, the shop used some nut to secure the ESF and RE to the receiver. A castle nut will come flush with the rear of the ESF.



    Rapid prototype with CNF and Vltor A5 RE.


    We'll be making a 2 lug wrench for the ESF. Since 1/4 of the castle nut is masked by the QD sockets housing, on rare occasions, not all three wrench notches are presented for torquing. Our short 2 lug castle nut wrench works on any castle nut.

    If the ESF looks familiar, it's because KAC, LWRC have done it already. ESF has a rear facing socket, which on the face of it doesn't sound like much, but took considerable tweaking to make possible. ESF will allow the use of a castle nut and for the carbine stock to fully collapse.

    Design calls for 7075 anodized for ESF's material, we're still looking at steel and its higher cost as an option.
    Last edited by Duffy; 05-15-18 at 13:26.
    Roger Wang
    Forward Controls Design
    Simplicity is the sign of truth

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,574
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Cool, thanks for the pic.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    1,069
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Clyde777 View Post
    I redid it will this be better or should I redo the whole thing? Attachment 51966
    I think that would have been a good stake if the castle nut was correct. The notch isn't letting metal displace effectively. The notch is so shallow where it touches the endplate that no metal gets to where it would interfere with rotation.
    Up to you if you want to redo it. If the castle nut was torqued properly to 40 foot pounds it will probably never ever loosen. But if probably isn't good enough, buy a milspec nut or Duffy's nut and re do it.


    Attachment 41482


    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    That's a good looking stake right there. Wonder why whoever made these out of spec nuts made them that way, it's probably cheaper to cut a 45 degree notch than that oval depression. Probably MIM or investment cast so it doesn't matter. Still, why not do it right?
    Roger Wang
    Forward Controls Design
    Simplicity is the sign of truth

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,104
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clyde777 View Post
    I redid it will this be better or should I redo the whole thing? Attachment 51966
    You're good. Quit worrying.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    2,976
    Feedback Score
    94 (100%)
    Duff - do the scallops have a purpose or for aesthetics? As far as castle nuts go, it is a nice looking nut.


    Quote Originally Posted by Duffy View Post
    I knew it was a nut DD uses, and it's out of spec. TDP castle nut staking notches are angled at 45 degrees, and 0.07 long.

    Factory, in spec castle nut on left, ours (CNF prototype) on right. We changed the staking notches from 45 to 30 degree to get make them longer and deeper.



    "Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may."
    ~ Sam Houston

    “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.”
    ~ Sam Adams

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    2,976
    Feedback Score
    94 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by eklarsen View Post
    Yes, it is plenty. Its only meant to keep it from loosening and you moved enough to prevent that.

    Usually when I see a long line of posts from knowledgeable members, including our Industry Professionals, and last but not least a guy who TEACHES Armorer Courses, and they are all saying that the staking is substandard... Well I reckon you can probably take it to the bank that it is in fact substandard.
    But you are new and don’t have many posts, so I doubt anyone will bust your chops for your lame answer.
    "Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may."
    ~ Sam Houston

    “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.”
    ~ Sam Adams

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The coarse serrations in the form of short and shallow scallops are a single use feature. I got tired of using the sharp wrench notches for serrations when I rotate the nut towards the receiver so I made sure ours would have some kind of aid.

    As you can see in the prototype (upper pic), the scallops are shorter in the production model (lower pic), the scallops drew too much attention and I toned them down. Probably the first time in the firearms business where a company intentionally tried to make things look more drab
    Roger Wang
    Forward Controls Design
    Simplicity is the sign of truth

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clyde777 View Post
    I redid it will this be better or should I redo the whole thing? Attachment 51966
    It depends, are you hitting the deck in a firefight? Buttstroking someone? Making a combat jump into Zaire? All those activities could place enough torsional stress on the joint that the stake would actually be needed to keep the castle nut from loosening.

    Seriously, try to get a little more displacement with the second stake and you should be GTG.

    I don't like re-staking an endplate the marks from the first stakes are just off putting to me, so I use a new one. Only a couple bucks unless you are rolling a QD endplate.

    Get a little more displacement on the other one and it will be fine.

    ETA: take a picture of the second one and post it, that will give me an excuse to come in and check the computer in about an hour. It's too dang hot for me to be digging and setting forms.
    Last edited by 26 Inf; 05-15-18 at 16:03.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •