Originally Posted by
Mr McSimon
With all this talk of the tight eyebox and "flicker", maybe the Leupold isn't the way to go after all. I'm curious as to a few people saying a FFP isn't really necessary on a 1-6, can somebody expand on that a bit? Seems like having all your subtentions accurate at any power would always be a better thing than not.
I had a chance to look through a Kahles and found something that surprised me. On 1x the scale was about 95% or something like that, until I made an adjustment of a few turns on the diopter ring to get the same scale in both left and right eyes when looking through it with both eyes open. It's obviously made that way, but why? Also, speaking of that scope, I like the SI1 reticle, but have read a number of times about people liking the SM1. I think better in MOA, so why would the SM1 be better unless you're skilled at mil calculation, or is it?
Bookmarks