Apparently the Army is taking a look at this concept again. Not sure why since it was tested and rejected 50 years ago, so it will probably come to nothing again:
https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovc...iSmallArms.pdf
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Apparently the Army is taking a look at this concept again. Not sure why since it was tested and rejected 50 years ago, so it will probably come to nothing again:
https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovc...iSmallArms.pdf
Last edited by Slater; 06-24-18 at 18:06.
Senior Member
More like 69 years ago, when this old man was 9 years old. Assume technology is ready for multiplex ammoOriginally Posted by Slater
EDIT: can't add, LOL 66 years ago, not 69
Maybe a better option would be to teach soldiers better marksmanship skills so they could hit their target with standard ammo.
Last edited by platoonDaddy; 06-25-18 at 03:23.
Senior Member
Attachment 52574
It's not 'gay', it's duplexing.
Hollowpoint gaping-ass tail.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks