Thank you for sharing your wisdom, we've been schooled.
Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.
While I'm of the opinion that this couldn't happen to a more deserving pile of poo, the real question is what would happen next. Putin seems to have pretty effectively eliminated all rivals, so much so that he seems to have brushed off the coup attempt with out much obvious damage. With how week he came off looking from that, you'd think any remaining rivals would have acted by now. If he has no real rivals, who's going to take power once he's moldering in the grave? Will that transition be of benefit to the west, or will the inherent instability of an autocracy without the chief autocrat cause more problems?
--British veteran of the Ukraine War, discussing the FN SCAR H.It's f*****g great, putting holes in people, all the time, and it just puts 'em down mate, they drop like sacks of s**t when they go down with this.
Nothing about this across any media forums.
That's enough. Take member issues to PM.
2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Sounds like something from a movie vs real life.
Putin leaving a sudden power vacuum in Russia, after pretty much eliminating his opposition, is not something we want/need right now. Our “leadership” alone bumbling around the globe is bad enough. Put a power vacuum in Russia with most moderates essentially eliminated from the pool means someone whackier than Putin gets the reigns. Not a good combo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks