Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Steel/stainless steel mags: Faster wear to aluminum parts of AR15?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    104
    Feedback Score
    0

    Steel/stainless steel mags: Faster wear to aluminum parts of AR15?

    I've asked around about steel and stainless steel AR mags in the past. One person opined that steel/stainless steel may wear out the aluminum parts of the AR15 that it touches at a faster rate than aluminum or polymer mags.

    Is that true?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,317
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    The only aluminum part it's going to come into contact with is the mag well of the lower receiver and I doubt it would cause any significant wear there. The mag catch is steel so that shouldn't be a problem.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,104
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    What about all the steel parts inside the AR coming into contact with aluminum parts?
    “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” -Augustine

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    407
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Slow down those mag changes, you’re gonna scratch it!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    799
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowspirit View Post
    I've asked around about steel and stainless steel AR mags in the past. One person opined that steel/stainless steel may wear out the aluminum parts of the AR15 that it touches at a faster rate than aluminum or polymer mags.

    Is that true?
    Perhaps another person has "opined" that the aluminum parts contribute to a longer life span of the steel/stainless steel magazines.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Damn. This is ARFcom subject matter from 2005!
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,574
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Wearing out a lower receiver with mag changes? Must be a real stud.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,588
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    No OP, that is a completely idiotic assessment that person made.

    Only reasons I see not to use them is greater weight, and likely higher price.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ViniVidivici View Post
    No OP, that is a completely idiotic assessment that person made.

    Only reasons I see not to use them is greater weight, and likely higher price.
    Bingo. Put 3 of those suckers in an old Deuce Gear pouch, and WOW! The weight really becomes real.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    768
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm going to admit to being a polymer mag whore for many years. And they certainly have their place. But these last few years I have been buying only Duramag stainless or aluminum depending on which is on sale. The weight difference is real. Holy crap. 3 or 4 on a chest rig running a CGB stage and you notice it. Then again, step on an aluminum mag that you dropped and step on a steel one. The aluminum one may not fair as well.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •