Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: April 24, 1980

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    6,000
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by yoni View Post
    I am going from memory, but I think Eagle Claw was overly complicated and then the really big problem was everyone wanted in on the act.
    .
    The issue with the helicopters if I remember correctly was that they were off of a ship and suffered from maintenance issues.But this failure resulted in the creation of the Night Stalkers.
    If I heard correctly, the different commanders involved in planning and preparation were not forthcoming with information needed to properly prepare for and execute the rescue operation. IIRC different steps should have been taken to prepare the aircraft involved in the operation. I am not an aviation rate, so I can't intelligently elaborate on what the Airdales complained about afterwards.

    I do believe the 160th SOAR was created as a result of the problems associated with the operation.
    Train 2 Win

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,885
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    If I heard correctly, the different commanders involved in planning and preparation were not forthcoming with information needed to properly prepare for and execute the rescue operation. IIRC different steps should have been taken to prepare the aircraft involved in the operation. I am not an aviation rate, so I can't intelligently elaborate on what the Airdales complained about afterwards.

    I do believe the 160th SOAR was created as a result of the problems associated with the operation.
    In addition to Eagle Claw, I have read that Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada) also involved everyone wanting in on the action. Of course it was only 3+ years after the debacle at Desert One so there were still some hiccups.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,082
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    In addition to Eagle Claw, I have read that Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada) also involved everyone wanting in on the action. Of course it was only 3+ years after the debacle at Desert One so there were still some hiccups.
    Even as late as 1989 we were making the same kind of mistakes. Mostly because of their fame for "getting it done", NSW team 4 was tasked with taking Punta Paitilla Airport during Just Cause when really it was the kind of thing Rangers excel at. Add in some basic miscommunication on the ground and a bunch of guys got caught in the open with unfortunate results.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,460
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Even as late as 1989 we were making the same kind of mistakes. Mostly because of their fame for "getting it done", NSW team 4 was tasked with taking Punta Paitilla Airport during Just Cause when really it was the kind of thing Rangers excel at. Add in some basic miscommunication on the ground and a bunch of guys got caught in the open with unfortunate results.
    I've heard that many times from different places about Rangers. When and where did this come in as doctrine? I can understand wanting airfields, but why the Rangers? What about the rangers makes them the go-to and not just airborne troops? Coming out of WWII, I would think that if anyone, Marine Recon would be tasked with it after the island jumping campaign in the Pacific.

    I also hear about the Ranger Battalion, but there is more than one, right? Or is it one is on standby all the time.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,082
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    I've heard that many times from different places about Rangers. When and where did this come in as doctrine? I can understand wanting airfields, but why the Rangers? What about the rangers makes them the go-to and not just airborne troops? Coming out of WWII, I would think that if anyone, Marine Recon would be tasked with it after the island jumping campaign in the Pacific.

    I also hear about the Ranger Battalion, but there is more than one, right? Or is it one is on standby all the time.
    In general terms, it's about having more experience with that kind of stuff vs. NSW which has their unique skill sets.

    https://www.army.mil/ranger/

    The 75th Ranger Regiment

    75th Ranger Regiment

    The 75th Ranger Regiment is a lethal, agile and flexible force, capable of conducting many complex, joint special operations missions. Today's Ranger regiment is the Army's premier direct-action raid force. Each of the four geographically dispersed Ranger battalions is always combat ready, mentally and physically tough, and prepared to fight our country's adversaries. Their capabilities include conducting airborne and air assault operations, seizing key terrain such as airfields, destroying strategic facilities, and capturing or killing enemies of the nation. Rangers are capable of conducting squad through regimental-size operations and are resourced to maintain exceptional proficiency, experience and readiness. The regiment remains an all-volunteer force with an intensive screening and selection process followed by combat-focused training. The 75th Ranger Regiment is a proud unit and a team of teams - serving the nation.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •