Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Why is there a difference in AR-15 & bolt action load charts?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    270
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Question Why is there a difference in AR-15 & bolt action load charts?

    I was just thinking of reloading a few hundered rounds of .223/5.56 tonight so I opened up the Sierra reloading manual and saw that there are 2 different charts for this caliber. Taking a closer look at the charts they have heavier loads for the Bolt Guns and lighter loads for the AR platform.

    Now this really blows my mind because I thought that the AR Weapons are made to handle hot military loads!

    Here is an example for max loads:

    Bolt Gun;
    55gr FMJ Powder H335 @ 27.5 grains 3,300 FPS

    AR-15;
    55gr FMJ Powder H335 @ 25.7 grains 3,000 FPS

    What am I missing here guys?
    Last edited by brown3345; 01-22-09 at 17:38. Reason: spelling

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Salem, OR/Anchorage AK
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I'll take a stab at this.

    1. The barrel for the rifle is probably listed as 24" The barrel for the AR-15A2 is 20". At a conservative loss of 30 FPS per inch to 50 FPS that would knock the difference down to 3100-3180 FPS

    2. No two barrel are alike. You can get two barrels off of the production line chambered with the same reamer and one will be show higher pressure before the other with the same load (faster barrel).

    If you are all that worried about it, Look in the back of the book under pistol loads for 223 shot out of a 14 or 16" contender. You will notice that the higher velocities in the pistol section are the faster burning powders, 4198, 3031 ect..... If you are so inclined to really push it, I'd recommend a Rem 7.5 or possibly a sml Rfl Mag primer working it up carefully. I'm comfortable with the forum load or AA 2230 with a 55gr FMJBT.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    270
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Yes, I can see that but it wouldn't explain the heavier powder charge they allow for the bolt gun.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Salem, OR/Anchorage AK
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    The Kool Aid Sale

    'I was just thinking of reloading a few hundered rounds of .223/5.56 tonight '


    'Now this really blows my mind because I thought that the AR Weapons are made to handle hot military loads!'


    Well, which is it, 223 Remington or 5.56 X 45mm. The SAAMI max for the 223 Remington is 52-55K PSI which the above and below loads are published for. 5.56 x 45mm US and NATO is loaded to a higher pressure in the 60-63K neighborhood. There is a source for this data at a nominal cost (assumed) posted on TOS I believe. I don't think you are going to get there with H335 but I have not seen 5.45 X 45mm data. Powders more suited for this is AA 2230, Varget, and BL-C (2) and possibly Win 748.

    These 'recommended' maximum loadings are from various manufactures here in the U.S. As you case see, they use a smorgashboard of various components to arrive at these maximum recommended loads in various barrels from 18.5 - 26" in length from 1-7 to 1-14 twists. When compared to one another, one sometimes doesn't look like the other. Life is grand with only one load manual. Add 2-3 and Uh.... These are '[B]LOAD GUIDES[B] 'The loads published within the confines of this and only this manual were safe within the confines of our test facility in the firearms used to yadda yadda yadda...... Sounds like I'm getting ready to fly someplace, ' In the event of and Emergency kiss your ass yada yada yada.


    Sierra (3rd Edition) Colt AR15-A1, 20" Brl, 1-12 twist, Case Remington

    Rem 7.5 Primer, Max 25.9gr H335, Vel 3000

    Sierra (5th Ed) Colt AR15 A-2, 20' Brl, 1-7 twist, Case Federal

    Rem 7.5 Primer, 25.7gr H-335, Vel 3000, [B]* COAL 2.250[B]

    Speer (11th Ed) Ruger Mini 14, 18.5" Brl 1-10 twist, Case WW

    CCI450 Primer, Max 27.0 gr H335, Vel 3193

    Hornady (4th Ed) Rem 700, 24" Brl, 1-12 twist, Case Hornady/Frontier

    Rem 7.5 Primer, Max 25.4 gr H335, Vel 3200

    Hornady (7th Ed) Rem 700, [B]26"[B]Brl1-12 twist, Case Win

    Win Sml Rfl Primer, Max 23.2 gr H335, Vel 3100

    Lyman (48th Ed, Copyright 2002) Universal Rcvr, 24" Brl, 1-12 twist, Rem Case

    Rem 7.5, [B]Sierra 55gr SPT[B], Max 27.0 gr H335, Vel 3270

    The above loading data was extracted from the listed [B]Load Guides[B]. Powders and primers change from lot to lot. I used to shoot alittle skeet and loaded 14.5gr of Grn Dot in my 20ga shells. About 1997, Alliant, in their wisdom changed Grn Dot alittle which pushed the pressures up and over the top and after I finished up the last original 8 lb keg I had, I had to move to Unique

    The pressure developed by a cartridge as previously stated is different for each barrel. A tighter bore, rougher finish, tighter chamber/neck, longer -vs- shorter barrel.

    I have a factory Colt A2 plane Jane that I used to shoot HP with. I worked up a SMK 69gr load out of the Sierra Ed 5 manual for the rifle. Please bear with me.

    LOAD
    223 Rem: Test Rifle Colt AR15 A2, 20" Brl, 1-7 twist, Rem Case & 7.5 Primer

    24.2-26.8gr Win748 for 25-2900 FPS. Accuracy Load 26.2gr Win748, COAL 2.260

    MY LOAD Rem Case, CCI BR4 Primer, 69gr SMK, COAL 2.260


    Grains, HV LV AVG ES SD Accuracy

    25.7 2930 2818 2857 112 43.3

    25.9 2895 2835 2859 60 21.7

    26.1 2932 2889 2913 42 17.9 5/8"

    26.3 2969 2870 2919 99 31.1

    The only component that I changed was the primer from a R7.5 to a BR4 and probably the lot of powder. How come I'm getting 113 FPS more than the book. The book or the rifle must be wrong. The book is published by XXXX so I guess my rifle is bad, any takers?

    Actually, the only way to tell is running the above load through a pressure barrel. Damn, I loaned mine to a friend before he move and he never returned it.

    Each load combination (Primer, powder and bullet) has a sweet spot in a rifle(s) (*no guarentee) . This sweet spot is were the pressure is just right that the powder burns the most uniformly. At least that is what we try to accomplish. Some loads might be very erratic but still prints one hole on top of another. It is a science, not law.

    At 26.1 grains, the load was right. It was the most uniform according to my chronograph and shot well to boot. The primers 'looked' good and could get several loads before I got uncomfortable using the brass. I continued with the testing to the max and the velocity just got more erratic which made the extreme spread and standard deviation even worse. If I recall correctly, the primers at 26.7 were flat. I wish I had the rest of the data on my log sheet to show you the whole picture from starting load to max. As you can see, the optimum charge weight for the 748 was in the area of 25.9 and 26.1. After getting the good results with 26.1 and the velocity, I ran with it without further testing. I tried to duplicate that load last year with a different lot of powder and primers. It looks like I'll have to re-invent the wheel for a 200 and 300yd load if I get back into HP again.

    Another good load is Sierra's 52/53gr bullets for reduced course (100 yd) firing. The 53gr FB is good in my rifle at 3100 with AA 2230. It's no a full bore load so it is abit softer on me and the rifle and as far as drift ect, it only needs to go 100m, after that it can do what it wants.

    You can experiment for yourself or follow suit. MARKM has been selling the Hornady 55gr FMJBT, WSR primer and 24.5 grains of TAC for a long time. I've tried it, got good results but am kinda stuborn since I'm sitting on 24 lbs of AA2230 that I got for a good price. Once that is gone, I'll probably move over to TAC. I've been putting together a 50lbs powder order the last couple of days and I've got an 8 pounder slot reserved for TAC. Drink the kool aid and be done with it.

    THE DISCLAIMER: THE LOADS LISTED IN THE ABOVE RAMBLE WERE SAFE IN THE FIREARMS YADA YADA YADA. Prudence is a survival tool.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    270
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Nicely said Ttwwaack! You know your user name reminds me of the noise my head made when it contacted my wifes shoe after I told her about my last gun purchase. Coincidental?

    Thanks,

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    2,345
    Feedback Score
    0
    Ttwwaack, this is great, but it still doesn't answer the question.

    Why a hotter load in a bolt gun than in an AR?

    Is it that .223-chambered (not 5.56) ARs simply aren't designed to handle as much oomph as a typical bolt gun?

    Or is it that there isn't time for the extra powder to burn in a 20" barrel, but it will in a 24" barrel?

    I made these up, but they make sense to me. I don't know, so I'm asking.

    Bimmer

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    82
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am also curious. Most other load sources don't break it down in AR-15 vs bolt, Speer does indicate which powders work for gas operated semi autos.

    One thing that comes to mind is the AR-15 is gas operated and not all powders / charges are suited for the gas system.
    Last edited by shadowalker; 01-23-09 at 20:48.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Salem, OR/Anchorage AK
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Why a hotter load in a bolt gun than in an AR?

    As I stated earlier, barrel length and bore condition. Both are probably stopping in the same neighborhood of pressure 50K. Once a load reaches it's optimal pressure, adding additional powder won't make it go faster reliably sorta like like the fuel air mixture for your vehicle. Accuracy will fall off and pressure spikes will occur ie (from above).


    Grains, HV LV AVG ES SD Accuracy

    25.7 2930 2818 2857 112 43.3

    25.9 2895 2835 2859 60 21.7

    26.1 2932 2889 2913 42 17.9 5/8"

    26.3 2969 2870 2919 99 31.1

    Although the max load data was 26.8, I settled on 26.1. The other two ten shot strings for 26.5 and 26.7 grains were shot but the extreme velocity spread and standard deviation just grew along with the group size. For that barrel (bore and length), 25.9 to 26.1 was optimal. Although 'the guide' stated I could go to 26.8 and stay within the 'SAAMI' pressure limits.

    Does that explain it? Look at the Hornady 4th and 7th edition data. Both are for a Rem 700 but one with a 26" and one with a 24".

    Hornady (4th Ed) Rem 700, 24" Brl, 1-12 twist, Case Hornady/Frontier

    Rem 7.5 Primer, Max 25.4 gr H335, Vel 3200

    Hornady (7th Ed) Rem 700, [b]26"[b]Brl1-12 twist, Case Win

    Win Sml Rfl Primer, Max 23.2 gr H335, Vel 3100

    There is a 2.0gr difference between the loads. The only differences are two different rifles, primers and cases. Confused yet, look at the Speer data for the Mini-14.

    Granted, a bolt gun is stronger than an AR-15 but both should be loaded close to SAMMI specs. Sure, you could load it up till the primers fell out and it would hold for awhile. The important question is how long is awhile?????

    I haven't tried the questioned [B][U]MAX LOAD[B][U] in a Bolt Action Remington 223. The STARTING LOAD is 23.5 gr of H335 with a Sierra 55gr projo and work it up from there. The 'manual' is a LOAD GUIDE. It tells you where to start and by your careful experimentation and observation where and when to stop. Sierra says to stop at 27.5, Hornady says to stop at 23.2. (7th) and 25.4 (4th).

    Based on a comparison of the different load data, I take Sierra's data with a grain of salt and work it up carefully since one manufacturer is calling another manufacturers starting load already over the max. Go figure. Just because it is in black and white does't mean that it is right. Unless the round is shot through a pressure barrel you have no way of knowing for sure.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    2,345
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm still confused... and I still don't think you're answering the question.

    I understand that the "max" charge is NOT the most accurate load.

    What I still don't understand is why the max charge for a bolt gun is more than for an AR.

    I'm not interested in loading rounds anywhere near the max, but since the "starting" charge is usually 10% less, and the difference between them is 6-7% different, it would seem that it matters...

    Bimmer

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    82
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by twaack
    As I stated earlier, barrel length and bore condition. Both are probably stopping in the same neighborhood of pressure 50K. Once a load reaches it's optimal pressure, adding additional powder won't make it go faster reliably
    While speculating is fun it is probably a good question just to ask Sierra, they are pretty friendly.

    The 223 / 5.56 case is pretty low capacity so I wouldn't expect much wasted powder even with slower powders (though they may not work with the gas system).

    What is interesting is Sierra used a 20" AR-15 and a 24 inch bolt action barrel, from what I've seen there isn't much velocity gain in 223 from 20 to 24 inches.

    There is a big gain from 16 to 18" and a respectable one from 18 to 20"though.
    Last edited by shadowalker; 01-24-09 at 10:15.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •