Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Mec-Gar 18rd P226 9mm mags reliable enough for carry use?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    492
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Talked to a sig rep about this. He says the only reason they don't use the larger mags is because the standards are already expensive enough. If you look at the price difference its usually substancial. If they went to the 18-20 mags as a standard it would just raise the price. A few guys in my department use the 13-15 round .40S&W mags, and they have had no issues in the hundreds of rounds they have shot through them. The only issue is on the ones that aren't flush fit it makes it harder to conceal the gun when off duty.

    I would say go for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddG View Post
    Personally, I wouldn't use them for carry. Three extra rounds seems great, but if it were that easy to increase capacity without compromising reliability the manufacturer (in this case, SIG) would switch to 18rd mags itself. After all, SIG buys their 15rd P226 mags from Mec-Gar.

    Remember, every time you read about a serious LE or .mil test of a handgun, it is with the factory magazines. For an example of what can happen when you outsource mags from a different vendor, reference The United States Military.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    529
    Feedback Score
    0
    From Midway USA:
    http://www.midwayusa.com/browse/Brow...1341***8905***

    P226 Mec-Gar 18rd magazines: $29.99
    P226 Sig Sauer 15rd magazines: $34.99(Mec-Gar made in Italy)

    The cost of using a different follower, and a different spring is quite small. I doubt that the cost of using 15rds instead of 18rds is Sig Sauer's modivaiton for using 15rd magazine. The UK recently adopted the P226 as they are phasing out their FN Highpowers and they are sticking with the 15rd magazine.
    Last edited by Marcus L.; 02-12-09 at 17:33.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    239
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sig is using them. The Blackwater tactical with four of them.

    http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/Sho...&productid=192

    The Sig store also sells them.

    http://www.sigsauer.com/SigStore/Sho...&productid=242

    I think MecGar knows as much or more about making magazines that work as Sig does about make pistols but that is just my biased opinion.

  4. #14
    ToddG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rathos View Post
    A few guys in my department use the 13-15 round .40S&W mags, and they have had no issues in the hundreds of rounds they have shot through them.
    Respectfully, how mags run for "hundreds of rounds" isn't really the issue. How will they run after being kept loaded for three years? How will they run after getting drenched in mud, buried in sand, etc.? Is there any increase in MRBS with the extra-capacity magazines?

    One would assume that if the higher capacity magazines are 100% as functional and durable as the standard capacity ones then SIG would be including them in all their guns. When is "lower capacity" ever a selling point?

    Quote Originally Posted by davemcdonald View Post
    Sig is using them. The Blackwater tactical with four of them.
    A gun that is sold through commercial channels and not intended for LE use. Does it still have a RED front night sight GREEN rear dots?

    I think MecGar knows as much or more about making magazines that work as Sig does about make pistols but that is just my biased opinion.
    I'd agree with that 100%. But Mec-Gar also has a history of making extra capacity magazines which are good but not as durable or reliable as the "factory" ones (which were also made by Mec-Gar). At least, that was the opinion of the Beretta and SIG engineers when I worked at those two companies.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    92
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had the extra capacity Mec Gars for the BHP, in addition to the MecGar OEMs. The OEMs held 13 rds as opposed to the extra capacity's 15 but they ran reliably for the three years I had the pistol.

    The extra capacity ones showed noticeably weaker springs after six months of use. (They were always loaded to capacity unless they were being used at the range.) Had a few skips. Slide cycled but round didn't strip from the mag. Didn't happen often, but I did note that it never happened with the OEM mags. Ammo was standard pressure 124gr ball.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    northern ohio
    Posts
    298
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    sig mags

    since Sig has mec gar making the mags for their guns. i would say u are gtg
    Sig's agreement to not let mec gar sell 15 rd mag to the public is just another reason not to own a Sig.

    i have sold over 400 mec gar mags a year for the last 6 years and feel they are the finest in the business
    i carry them in my HP and Beretta's when ever i use these guns for anything. and yes i would bet my life on them.

    i dont sell any for ruger or Sig as both companies exploit the consumer and there are much better companies to give my business to. i was offered sig samples at the show and politely refused.
    f.y.i the mec gar folks are 1 of the best in the industry. note they put xpower springs in the higher cap mags, and they roll their own

    they make mags for

    Springfield
    Sig
    Beretta
    HP
    smith
    CZ and several other that slip my mind

    best of luck with them
    Last edited by jjw; 02-14-09 at 21:10.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I used the Mec Gar 17 and 20 round mags for my then duty weapons, S&W 3rd gen 9mms, for years. Never had an issue.

    Mec Gar makes very good magazines.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    53
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by davemcdonald View Post
    Sig is using them. The Blackwater tactical with four of them.

    http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/Sho...&productid=192

    The Sig store also sells them.

    http://www.sigsauer.com/SigStore/Sho...&productid=242

    I think MecGar knows as much or more about making magazines that work as Sig does about make pistols but that is just my biased opinion.

    Looks like it comes with 4 of the 20rd 'SCT' magazines? (Which are the new version of the 20rd 'SWAT' magazines, I am guessing?)


    I think what I will wind up doing is picking up a few new 15rd magazines for carry use for the time being, and a sampling of the larger capacity magazines, and run those at the range to see what I can see...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    286
    Feedback Score
    0
    Meg Gar mags have been perfect in all of my weapons, Beretta 92 FS and D model Centurion, A Argentine FMP FN Highpower copy that wasnt reliable with the factory mags is completely reliable with these, Hell I even bought 4-9 rounders for my STI Trojan .38 Super and these work as well as the single Metalform that came with the gun for $10 less. I'm completely sold on their products.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,456
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    Looks like it comes with 4 of the 20rd 'SCT' magazines? (Which are the new version of the 20rd 'SWAT' magazines, I am guessing?)


    I think what I will wind up doing is picking up a few new 15rd magazines for carry use for the time being, and a sampling of the larger capacity magazines, and run those at the range to see what I can see...
    I thought the SWAT 20rd mags had dimples on the side near the bottom. The SCT mags are the same as MECGAR 20rnd AFC mags, right.

    I was planning on running 18 and 20rnd MECGARS thru a Sig at the Magpul pistol class in June. 2000 rounds will tell me what I need to know.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •