Originally Posted by
Gutshot John
They don't play favorites and in my experience, even when I've been less than appreciative privately, they keep an even hand publicly.
I would concur with that.
In a perfect world, I would much prefer that a member's past history and reputation be considered when meting out punishment, but I've held Moderator responsibilities on boards that are exponentially larger than this one, and the truth of the matter is that it is unrealistic to expect every staffer to be able to discern the wheat from the chaff in a given situation. It's the difference between justice and fairness ... and we tend to get justice around here. Can't really argue the point, even if the voltage on the Infractionometer is a cranked up a bit too high for my tastes at times. I don't want idiots to get free rein, but I would like to see core contributors treated with a modicum of deference when there is any doubt in such matters.
Yes, I'm still mortified to be labeled an evildoer -- even on a minor league scale -- but I'm pretty sure that I'll recover. Eventually.
AC
Stand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.
Bookmarks