Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: 223 VS Deer... 3 years of bullet tests and data..

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Medina, Ohio
    Posts
    650
    Feedback Score
    0

    Thumbs up 223 VS Deer... 3 years of bullet tests and data..

    good reads...

    http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/138...ad_update.html

    links to the past years in that thread...
    Last edited by Ring; 11-24-12 at 13:22.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loxahatchee, Fl
    Posts
    196
    Feedback Score
    0
    I just tagged, that is a cool thread. Thanks
    May you be in heaven at least an hour before the devil knows your dead.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    616
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Pretty good thread, shot placement is everything. All his shots were lung shots, had they been gut shots he would have probably been chasing those deer for a while.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    342
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    That thread was ultimately why I was ok with hunting with my AR this year. Just put down a nice 6 point with a 70gr barnes, loaded via ASYM today actually. He took a step I didn't want him to take so it messed up the shot I wanted. Still yet, he only ran for >50 yards & dropped.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    0
    Just in case you have not seen the effects of the 5.56mm on humans, here's one but be warned ... these are human injuries and are pretty graphic.

    http://www.timawa.net/forum/index.php?topic=17111.0

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loxahatchee, Fl
    Posts
    196
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by arthury View Post
    Just in case you have not seen the effects of the 5.56mm on humans, here's one but be warned ... these are human injuries and are pretty graphic.

    http://www.timawa.net/forum/index.php?topic=17111.0
    Holy crap!!! Thats brutal
    May you be in heaven at least an hour before the devil knows your dead.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    338
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I have taken a number of white tail with the .223, and the caliber seems to do just fine provided that shot placement is good. I have hit a few in the gut though and I spend a long time trying to track them down. However, as the OP in the linked thread observed, the lighter grain, higher velocity loads seemed to have more rapid incapacitation effects on the deer.....particularly if my shot placement was less than ideal. This seems to be a very common observation with those of us in the hunting community regardless of rifle caliber.
    Last edited by S. Galbraith; 11-25-12 at 09:20.
    Insert impressive resume here.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think that we are learning that bullet integrity is the key, regardless of caliber. The larger caliber bullets held together better than the smaller calibers and hunters of the past tended to favor them for big game.

    Now we have some pretty sturdy small caliber bullets that if given enough velocity, can get to the vitals that no varmint bullet could reach on other than broad side shots.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    248
    Feedback Score
    0
    Those seem to be pretty tiny deer down there...

    Most of ours are twice that size...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    194
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sandy/low quality soil means low nutritional content vegetation, and smaller deer are a result.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •