Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: 6.8 SPC Build

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    Really do not think threading a 6.8 barrel 1/2-28 is a wise idea as your barrel thickness at the threads will only be .1115". But that is just me.

    .500"-.277"=.223/2=.1115"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for the heads up, what would you suggest instead?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DDKJR1814
    Thanks for the heads up, what would you suggest instead?
    The .mil specified 5/8-24 for the 6.8 SPC project. This info is taken from Zak Smith's 6.8 info website.

    What muzzle brakes / flash-hiders are available for 6.8SPC (5/8-24)

    The MSTN/PRI Quiet Control ("QC") Comp. This is a modern comp and should be as effective as the JP BC Comp, the Miculek comp, or the Benny Hill comp (which are only available in 5.56).

    The Vortex flash-hider. Smith Enterprises' Vortex for the Remington 700 PSS (.308) will work with 6.8SPC. You must request some custom machine work to match the shoulder-muzzle dimensions. It is threaded for 5/8"-24tpi.

    Phantom 308 flash hider.

    OPSINC 4-port brake. Pictured above, this is an older-technology brake.
    OPSINC 2-port brake. This brake has only one chamber and is primarily designed as an attachment point for an OPSINC suppressor. OPSINC suppressors are only available to LEO & Military in the US because OPS is located in California.



    Armalite AR-10 muzzle brake

    This should be a good start as most 6.8 SPC barrel being sold as of late are 5/8-24. .625"-.277"=.348"/2=.174" as a wall thickness.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    324
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    You will really like a 6.8 SPC. Everyone I have let this thing loose with is building one. I will very soon use it exclusively as my primary carbine. It's easier to outfit one guy than the whole Army I suppose.

    I managed to squirrel away 1500 rds and 1000 rds of brass to reload. It is exceptionally accurate IMO. I have to get the chrony out but it seems to have a good bit of steam.









    BTW, IIRC Ops Inc cans are GTG everywhere now as are Surefire. The CA restriction is over.

    Stag lower and LPK
    Colt M4 upper
    CMT bolt carrier and MP bolt
    LT 13.2
    Noveske 16.1 Recon barrel cut back to 15 with Ops 4 port brake
    Matech rear and troy front sights
    Magpul PRS stock
    TD bipod
    PRI 25rd mag
    NF 2.5-10 NXS w/NP-R2 reticle in LT SPR mount

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL.
    Posts
    2,395
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    My 6.8 build:
    -PRI/Douglas SS 18" SPR barrel/CMT M4 upper
    -Lauer lower
    -Leupold Mk4 4.5-14x50 LR/T with ill. TMR ret.
    Plus a whole lot of LaRue stuff!

    \

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    155
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 223Rem
    Really do not think threading a 6.8 barrel 1/2-28 is a wise idea as your barrel thickness at the threads will only be .1115". But that is just me.

    .500"-.277"=.223/2=.1115"
    Using 1/2x28 is a non-issue. I've been using 1/2x28 threaded 6.8 barrels for very abusive testing, and if it was a problem it would have shown itself by now. I've ran them suppressed, sustained fire, etc.

    I mean, if it was a problem do you think Surefire would be using that thread for the FA68A cans?
    Save the Pandas!

    -Tally Fortenberry
    -Capco Small Arms Research Group

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnCrunch
    Using 1/2x28 is a non-issue. I've been using 1/2x28 threaded 6.8 barrels for very abusive testing, and if it was a problem it would have shown itself by now. I've ran them suppressed, sustained fire, etc.

    I mean, if it was a problem do you think Surefire would be using that thread for the FA68A cans?
    Considering Surefire is relatively new to the suppressor game, there are bound to be some growing pains. Couldn't it also be possible Surefire went with the 1/2-28 threads as a marketing plan, as to offer so-called cross compatibility with the 5.56? Do any other companies offer suppressors for the 6.8 with the 1/2-28 thread as a standard?

    Really not sure, but if the .mil spec'ed a different thread pitch maybe they know something that Surefire doesn't or vise versa. My first 6.8 barrel from WOA is threaded 1/2-32 and there seems to be no issues, so you are probably right. Hmmmmm........ makes me think that I should have my other 6.8 barrel threaded to 1/2-28 (currently a 5/8-24). It would definitely open up the options for muzzlebrakes.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    155
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've heard that the mil 5/8x24 thread was to keep folks from trying to put 5.56 flash suppressors on the 6.8 barrels. Funny thing though, all of the A2 FS that I have are more than generous enough to allow the 6.8 to work fine.

    BTW, just compared a FA556A suppressor adapter to a FA68A one... Perfect match. Exact same flash suppressor.
    Save the Pandas!

    -Tally Fortenberry
    -Capco Small Arms Research Group

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    529
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Cohiba,

    That is one beautiful 6.8 carbine! I'm trying really hard to not like the 6.8SPC and you're not helping...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    60
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stephen
    In addition to the mid-length gas system (except for shorties), make sure you get a barrel with the M4 feed ramp extensions. This will ensure 100% reliability across all ammo types. Also, I have shot form 110gr to 150gr through my 1X9.5 with excellent accuracy.

    Good luck! The 6.8mm is a hell of a lot of fun.

    Stephen
    Would you mind posting the laod data you use for the heavier bullets?

    PM inbound

    Thanks
    Tim

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •