Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: What gets a can hotter -- slow fire or auto? Mythbusters.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    5,963
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    It is pretty interesting, to say the least. If I had hypothesized before seeing this, I would have said, "Full auto, 200rds would be a lot more heat transfer..."

    Seeing this graph of each is eye-opening.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Finleyville, PA
    Posts
    216
    Feedback Score
    0
    The graph needs a mark on it showing when the firing stopped for each line.

    The different shape of the semi plot is most likely due to the longer time it took to fire 200 rounds compared to the full-auto plot.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SW UT
    Posts
    316
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    I originally planned to use two Beta Mags but they proved unreliable.
    The video shows that Beta-C mags were used during the semi-auto portion and 30-rd mags during the FA portion. IIRC, the first B-C malf'd 4 or 5 times and the second B-C malf'd once. There were no malfs using the 30-rd magazines.

    I found this very interesting, especially considering that the B-C mags were only being fired at a rate of 1 shot about every 1 or 1.5 seconds.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    I did not add lube them up with graphite. I assumed they were fine as I had not used them much if ever.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •