Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: XDM vs glock and m&p

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    165
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    XDM vs glock and m&p

    I know that generally, although it is quite popular, the XD is not quite as highly regarded as the glock or m&ps are when it comes to being a combat grade pistol/design by those who get out and put large amounts of ammo downrange each year. Just curious, does the XDM have any significant design improvements over the original XD that might decrease the likelihood of small parts breakage and increase the overall durability/reliability of the gun?? Is it simpler, does it have less parts, anything??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    554
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    the main upgrades to the XDm that I am aware of are


    1) "match grade" barrel

    2) different sights

    3) ergo grip w/ interchangeable backstraps

    4) i believe the reset on the XDm is better than the XD, similar in concept to sig's SRT...but I could be wrong about that...


    as far as small parts and longevity go, to my knowledge, that hasn't significantly changed from the XD to the XDm...really, only time will tell...

    I do have a very good friend who works for a major training center...he continues to report that the XDs that come through there are pretty consistently the bottom end of reliability...next time I talk to him I will try and remember to ask him about the XDm

    personally, I would buy a glock or M&P before I bought an XD of any flavor,...
    VA Arms Co alumnus

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    165
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by trio View Post
    the main upgrades to the XDm that I am aware of are


    1) "match grade" barrel

    2) different sights

    3) ergo grip w/ interchangeable backstraps

    4) i believe the reset on the XDm is better than the XD, similar in concept to sig's SRT...but I could be wrong about that...


    as far as small parts and longevity go, to my knowledge, that hasn't significantly changed from the XD to the XDm...really, only time will tell...

    I do have a very good friend who works for a major training center...he continues to report that the XDs that come through there are pretty consistently the bottom end of reliability...next time I talk to him I will try and remember to ask him about the XDm

    personally, I would buy a glock or M&P before I bought an XD of any flavor,...
    Interesting...btw what reliability problems were they having. I keep hearing about xd reliability problems but I can never find any concrete instances by using the search function on this forum...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,481
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    There are a couple of XD forums that can answer this better than I can, but since no one has replied I will try...I do own one for my wife and so far it is a pretty good shooter (hate the trigger yet eats any HP I put thru it) From what I understand there are no ground breaking improvements, but from what I've read they did listen to certain complaints about takedown safety. (typical they worked mostly on safety stuff to help get it adopted by departments and less on performance)

    The ergonomics are a little better, little better grip surface (subjective), better sights, during takedown you do NOT have to pull the trigger to remove slide as before (is a good improvement), the trigger is allegedly a little better with a little better reset.

    This is what I have read and from gun store handling, have NOT shot it yet.

    If I had known that I could not get "factory" parts to be able to fix myself I would not have bought it. When I can convince my wife it will be changed out for an M&P (with the pink grip She like pink and if that gets her to shoot then I will load pink ammo

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    554
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    without throwing my buddy under the bus....


    the classes that are conducted are generally for "operators" or professionals over a course of several days

    over those several days, the round counts approach the 1500-2000 round mark

    according to him, certain platforms were prone to small parts breakage, and severe reliability issues the longer they were run...one of the specific guns he mentioned was the XD...FTF, FTE, etc....i'm sorry I can't be more specific, but I didn't ask for more

    i know this is the interwebs and the "well this guy told me this so it is now GOSPEL!!!" is common


    all I can say is this

    someone whose opinion i value and trust told me that I would be better off without XDs, and I believe him

    unfortunately you will likely have to discover that on your own (or take my word at it...)...but if you talk to enough people I believe this opinion will be pretty consistent
    VA Arms Co alumnus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    554
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by M4Fundi View Post

    If I had known that I could not get "factory" parts to be able to fix myself I would not have bought it. When I can convince my wife it will be changed out for an M&P (with the pink grip She like pink and if that gets her to shoot then I will load pink ammo

    not to hijack, but out of curiousity don't you have the same factory parts problems with an M&P? to my knowledge, it is similar to the XD in that it pretty much requires a trip to smith and wesson (or other gunsmith) to be tinkered with and that parts are not readily available to us "mere mortals"...truthfully one of the things that keeps me on glocks from M&Ps is the fact that if I wanted the pro sear in an M&P I had to pay $150 and send it back to S&W to get done
    VA Arms Co alumnus

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    165
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by trio View Post
    without throwing my buddy under the bus....


    the classes that are conducted are generally for "operators" or professionals over a course of several days

    over those several days, the round counts approach the 1500-2000 round mark

    according to him, certain platforms were prone to small parts breakage, and severe reliability issues the longer they were run...one of the specific guns he mentioned was the XD...FTF, FTE, etc....i'm sorry I can't be more specific, but I didn't ask for more

    i know this is the interwebs and the "well this guy told me this so it is now GOSPEL!!!" is common


    all I can say is this

    someone whose opinion i value and trust told me that I would be better off without XDs, and I believe him

    unfortunately you will likely have to discover that on your own (or take my word at it...)...but if you talk to enough people I believe this opinion will be pretty consistent
    thankyou trio, I believe you

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    643
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Plenty of XD related faults listed here:
    http://m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=14204

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    4,719
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Here's another list of threads:

    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=30221

    M_P

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    0
    Here is a real world, first hand account of XD problems:

    I had one, first handgun I ever bought for myself. I bought it for it's added safety features over the Glock, for use in the police academy. When I picked it up, I was instructed to fire at least 200 rounds through it for "break in" before carrying it or using it in a class. Okay, no problem, I'm glad to shoot and you just gave me a reason to justify the expense. I went out and bought 500 rounds of ammo, various makers, various bullet weights etc. I cleaned the gun, relubed and went to my make shift range (a pasture with a stock tank and a large earthen dam.) I loaded up 5 mags, 2 X 10 rounds, and 3 X 12 rounds, chambered and fired. BANG, BANG....nothing. The third round had stripped off the mag, started to feed into the chamber and lodged at about a 45 degree angle. I cleared the jam, rechambered and tried again, same problem. Being my first pistol, I continued this batter for 500 rounds, some improvement toward the end, but still jammed at least once on every mag. Bought more ammo and tried again, no signifigant improvement so I started doing research online and found several people complaining of same issue. I guess I should note that I cleaned the weapon meticulously before and after each range session. I called Springfield and got the "Wow, that's the first we've heard of that type of problem! Send it in, we'll look at it and ship it back and reimburse you for shipping costs." I'm thinking, okay, CS is good, so I send it back, and get it back in about 5 days, with an obviously recut feedramp and a letter stating that the weapon was in spec, but due to the photos (about 20) of the gun in the jammed condition as well as the marks left on the cases that jammed that I sent along, they decided to recut the feed ramp. I immediately went back out and fired another 500 rounds, with only 3 failures. Relatively good, but as a defensive weapon, if it jams once under perfect conditions, with my luck it will jam when I'm under fire. I called them again, they agreed to look at it again, but "unable to replicate the problem" and suggested that maybe I was "limp wristing" the weapon. Okay, since this is my first handgun, I thought, well, maybe, so I let a buddy, who was extremely well versed in handgun shooting, try the weapon. He experienced the same problems I was having. At this point, it was firearms time at the academy, and I didn't have time to send it in again, nor the money to replace it, so I went through a couple thousand rounds in the course of 3 days, in what I would call a very low intensity fassion, and experienced about 10 failures to feed, exactly as I had been experienceing. I then decided the ditch that weapon and get a Glock. I have since owned 3 glocks, an older S&W 4006 and a S&W M&P 9c and have not had a failure of any kind on any of the glocks, and the only failure of the M&P was with gunshow reloads. They were the first 100 round through the gun, and it short stroked a few times, so I assumed they had light loads, when using even cheap factory ammo, it functions 100%.

    Another guy in my academy class had a 5" "tactical" XD and experienced the same problems I was having, only with less frequency.

    So there you have a first hand account of the XD's problems, and my recommendation to stay away from them.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •