Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: BCM Middy or Carbine?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    176
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    BCM Middy or Carbine?

    I am ordering my upper receiver on Tuesday, so I have to decide on which one.

    Help me out here, what are the pro's and con's if any?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    2,383
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I don't think there is a "wrong" answer here, but I prefer the mid-length. Many will cite a softer recoil impulse and less stress on the bolt, both due to the longer gas system resulting in lower pressures and less violent cycling. True but I think it is less noticeable unless you are a high-volume shooter. In a standard configuration, I like the longer handguards, they allow better hand placement especially with a light. Of course if you add oversized railed handguards over a lo-pro gas block then that aspect is a toss up. Honestly I don't think the carbine gas system holds any advantage over a midlength in a 16" carbine, unless you're trying to make it match a another rifle that's a carbine setup (like maybe an issued weapon).
    --Josh H.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    49
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by marh415 View Post
    I am ordering my upper receiver on Tuesday, so I have to decide on which one.

    Help me out here, what are the pro's and con's if any?

    If you're going for a 16'', middy is the way to go. You still have room to go down to 14.5.

    If you're getting anything shorter than that, get the carbine.

    There are a trillion threads about carbine vs middy. Look them up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts
    490
    Feedback Score
    0
    LOKNLOD pretty much covered it. I personally chose the BCM 16" Midlength and love it FWIW.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,211
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would get a 16" midlength, or possibly a pinned 14.5 BCM from G&R if you want it for home defense. I would choose either way before a 16" carbine.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    271
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Don't forget about the midlength's longer sight radius.
    I like girl scout cookies.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Middy all the way. No comparison.



    C4

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    With the profiles of the two barrels currently available I would take the mid-length.

    Once BCM gets their lightweight barrels to market an argument could be made for sticking with carbine-length as it will allow for an overall lighter carbine.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,122
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post

    Once BCM gets their lightweight barrels to market an argument could be made for sticking with carbine-length as it will allow for an overall lighter carbine.

    How much lighter?
    NOT in training for combat deployment.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Hard to say, really. I guess I could weigh a carbine-length handguard and gas tube and a mid-length and see what the differences are. But it's as much about where the weight falls (on the support hand almost entirely) as how much it is.

    I'm thinking of a lightweight gun in this case for a smaller-statured person like a woman or child.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •