|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
6th Edition Military PHTLS says the I/O route is preferable as it's cleaner and faster, with less need for sterile technique on the battlefield. It makes mention of several products including the FAST-1 that can deliver I/O access on various parts of the body.
The sternum was chosen for the FAST apparently since the landmarks are more readily apparent and that the I/O site is less exposed than it would be on a limb.
Last edited by Gutshot John; 12-29-09 at 16:32.
It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen
Member
......
Last edited by MIKE G; 05-08-17 at 21:55.
Member
I have trained with the FAST System I love it. I have seen it used once on a patient in Central America on a medical missions trip (should been there a few minutes sooner). We are planning to carry them as a 3rd IV access protocol. Waiting to get the funds and/or donation to get a few units.
Member
......
Last edited by MIKE G; 05-08-17 at 21:55.
Industry Professional
Nice. If I remember correctly, those are not approved for CONUS by the FDA. Any idea where I may be able to get one?
I am seriously considering the EZ IO to supplement my FAST. I like having other options available. FAST is a one location device, and blunt trauma to the sternum may rule it out. I will have to find a qualified instructor for certification to cover my ass.
ParadigmSRP.com
Industry Professional
Turns out Chinook sells them:
http://www.chinookmed.com/cgi-bin/it...ice-and-Needle
ParadigmSRP.com
Member
.......
Last edited by MIKE G; 05-08-17 at 03:09.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks