I just sent close to 2,000 rounds of Hornady steel-cased practice ammo through a 6940 over three days without a single ammo related failure (I had one double-feed atributed to an old magazine) and the chamber and extractor don't look any worse than they do after shooting brass cased ammo.
But by the time you put 15-20K through it with brass cased, you could have paid for a brand new 1500-2000 rifle with the savings shooting steel.
I won't shoot steel through my suppressor due to the dirty powder, but for high volume shooting it does make economical sense.
This thread is quickly devolving into idiocy.
If you dont like steel cased ammo, fine, dont shoot it. Until you can provide a REASON why it is VASTLY inferior to brass cased ammo for training and plinking...just do us a favor and stay the heck out of these threads. The elitist attitude in regards to being too good for steel cased ammo or owning a firearm that ONLY digests nothing but gold plated cases with rose impregnated bullets is also moronic.
If my life were on the line i would never, EVER rely on steel cased ammo but for 99% of the shooting community steel cased is more than adequate.
I would rather just shoot, period end of story. It just so happens that i shoot between 200 and 750 rounds a month out of my AR's. If its significantly cheaper and it works for me...hey, i get to spend the savings on other things.
Bookmarks