i refer to the last paragraph of my reply:
it's not an inherently "m16" part to begin with, as i said. it's just identified as "m16" because an alternative came out, and people are lazy and nicknames stick. more importantly, however- the ATF doesn't have to say something is OK for it to be OK... it's the exact opposite- they have to say something is NOT OK for it to be not-ok.the only reason the STANDARD bolt carrier group is identified as the "m16" BCG is because Colt came out with a supposedly "AR15" BCG that wouldn't operate an autosear. they did this on their own, along with their big hole uppers, large FCG pins, and shelf blocks, to CYA in the event the firearms industry ever became the target of civil suits. otherwise, the question never would have come up, and all we'd have would be one basic cut of carrier
there are probably a handful of copy/pastes of letters people have received from the ATF floating around on this website that do state, specifically, that it's OK to have a STANDARD (I'm gonna start calling it "standard" instead of "m16") BCG... if you spend some time googling/searching, you can most assuredly find them. that doesn't really address your original concern about taking other people's memos for it. but they'll send you the same letter they send everyone.
Bookmarks