I grew up on irons, and one day the Army gave me an optic, and that basically was my transition.
We used to shoot to 600m with irons, as well as do CQB. I truly beleive that irons are the basics that give the shooter an understanding of the platform, and external ballistics, specifically the trajectory.
After 9/11 I did a little optics test, using irons, EO's, Aimpoints, ACOG and ELCAN's.
In close with the shooter static under perfect conditions, the average iron shooter was faster, and had better shot locations on the targets (the various letargets.com offerings). However when lighting and target movement where entered in, the even basic drills like an El Presidente (okay a tgt shifting version) the EO and Aimpoint cleaned up.
Add in shooter movement, target movement, various lighting situations, and our of 40 shooters - some who had no previous CCO experience, only Irons and C79 Elcans) the EO (551 and 552) outshot everyone else, with the Aimpoint (Comp M2 and M3) a close - but noticeable second.
Now, ideally I think you start with irons. However if little Ms. SoccerMom is buying an M4, I say get the Aimpoint M4S or T1 - leave it on all the time, and that is all you teach her.
Why -- she and the vast majority of gun owners will never take enough training to master the system, it takes hundreds of thousands of rounds to get used to something akin to mastery. There are probably less than 40 of us on the board that have shot over a million rounds thru a M16FOW, and I don't call myself a master.
In that case, I do think that getting the most bang for the 'buck' is to just teach the CCO.
Bookmarks