Page 13 of 91 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 908

Thread: The S&W M&P problem thread

  1. #121
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrMark View Post
    Please make sure to NOT take what I said out of context.

    I was referring to how one breaks down the weapon and nothing else.


    C4

  2. #122
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Norinco_Luv View Post
    Do the M&P9 Pro's have these same issues??


    Dane
    Since they run the PC Sear, they can. If they are in 9mm, they can have extraction issues with WWB 9mm ammo.


    C4

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,224
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Please make sure to NOT take what I said out of context.
    ...but in context, it's no fun!


    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    I was referring to how one breaks down the weapon and nothing else.
    I know. You were clear. ...still gotta have fun with it.



    Ironically, I've never used the little sear drop wire to take down an M&P. I use the trigger to drop the sear for disassembly, like I do for a Glock. The little tool has never even been out of the grip of my M&P9.

    That said, I understand designing to reduce liability, and removing a step that is a part of every ND is certainly understandable.
    GLOCK PREFECTION

  4. #124
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrMark View Post
    ...but in context, it's no fun!



    I know. You were clear. ...still gotta have fun with it.



    Ironically, I've never used the little sear drop wire to take down an M&P. I use the trigger to drop the sear for disassembly, like I do for a Glock. The little tool has never even been out of the grip of my M&P9.

    That said, I understand designing to reduce liability, and removing a step that is a part of every ND is certainly understandable.

    I am all for fun (at my expense).


    C4

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Keep in mind that I currently am authorized a 1911 and 9 mm Glock.

    Riverine's comments above are right on. Maybe we are just lucky, but we have not seen any major problems yet with M&P's (primarily .40 & .45's). I was involved in a M&P40 trial at a large agency where four M&P40's fired 7000 rounds each in 1 week without any significant problems--despite a lack of cleaning and lube, no failures to feed or function occurred. The M&P40 may just be the best LE service pistol produced to date Without a doubt, the M&P offers the softest shooting feel and least subjective recoil of any .40 S&W I have shot--despite the larger caliber, the M&P40 feels a lot like shooting a 3rd Gen G17. The most recent M&P40's (primarily DSW SN's) I've shot had very good stock triggers that felt fine right out of the box. On the other hand, the M&P45's (mainly MPU SN's) had relatively poor triggers at first, but by 1000 or so rounds they smoothed out to an acceptable feel. 10-8 baseplates work great and seem to prevent baseplate cracking issues--I personally use them on all my M&P mags. I know a lot of folks have broken strikers, but despite a lot of dry firing (albeit with snap-caps) of multiple M&P's, I have yet to break a striker. The M&P 40's and especially the 45's have proven to be very accurate. Most importantly, I cannot recall ever personally seeing a malfunction with a full-size M&P40 or M&P45. The M&P40 w/ambi safety and possibly a Performance Center or Apex sear will be the service pistol I'll pick if I ever go back to patrol duties again; likewise, if I ever choose to migrate away from a 1911, the M&P45 is what will replace it... On the other hand, despite ToddG's great test proving the 9 mm M&P efficacy, for now I'll stick with 3rd gen 9 mm Glocks over the 9 mm M&P due to their superb history and parts availability.

    Oh--someone I know who has shot a lot more 9 mm M&P's than I, have mentioned that the M&P does indeed shoot better with higher pressure rounds do to the locking sequence with the pistol.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    118
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by S500N View Post
    I have a couple of further questions as it relates to the lack of trigger reset.

    1. Has anybody experienced this with the stock sear?

    2. Does anybody have a PC sear that did not exhibit reset issues early on but then developed them down the road, say after at least a couple thousand rounds or more?

    Thanks,

    Steve
    Just started happening to me on a box stock M&P 40 that I was using while teaching a CCW class this weekend. App. 3,000 rounds through the pistol and had it occur 3 times in 200 rounds during the course of the class.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    643
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Keep in mind that I currently am authorized a 1911 and 9 mm Glock.

    Riverine's comments above are right on. Maybe we are just lucky, but we have not seen any major problems yet with M&P's (primarily .40 & .45's). I was involved in a M&P40 trial at a large agency where four M&P40's fired 7000 rounds each in 1 week without any significant problems--despite a lack of cleaning and lube, no failures to feed or function occurred. The M&P40 may just be the best LE service pistol produced to date Without a doubt, the M&P offers the softest shooting feel and least subjective recoil of any .40 S&W I have shot--despite the larger caliber, the M&P40 feels a lot like shooting a 3rd Gen G17. The most recent M&P40's (primarily DSW SN's) I've shot had very good stock triggers that felt fine right out of the box. On the other hand, the M&P45's (mainly MPU SN's) had relatively poor triggers at first, but by 1000 or so rounds they smoothed out to an acceptable feel. 10-8 baseplates work great and seem to prevent baseplate cracking issues--I personally use them on all my M&P mags. I know a lot of folks have broken strikers, but despite a lot of dry firing (albeit with snap-caps) of multiple M&P's, I have yet to break a striker. The M&P 40's and especially the 45's have proven to be very accurate. Most importantly, I cannot recall ever personally seeing a malfunction with a full-size M&P40 or M&P45. The M&P40 w/ambi safety and possibly a Performance Center or Apex sear will be the service pistol I'll pick if I ever go back to patrol duties again; likewise, if I ever choose to migrate away from a 1911, the M&P45 is what will replace it... On the other hand, despite ToddG's great test proving the 9 mm M&P efficacy, for now I'll stick with 3rd gen 9 mm Glocks over the 9 mm M&P due to their superb history and parts availability.

    Oh--someone I know who has shot a lot more 9 mm M&P's than I, have mentioned that the M&P does indeed shoot better with higher pressure rounds do to the locking sequence with the pistol.

    Interesting, I'd like to know more about this

  8. #128
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Sticks
    Posts
    2,875
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    So would I..
    I reload, and I have noticed a accuracy difference with warmer loads, I don't know why, but both of my M&P's (9&45) seem to prefer a warmer load...
    Last edited by ralph; 05-05-10 at 18:39.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    643
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Maybe it has to do with S&W wacky 1/18ish twist? I know SL has a 1/16 and I hope that's what Bar-Sto goes with.
    Last edited by G34Shooter; 05-05-10 at 21:02.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    118
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ohiorifleman View Post
    Just started happening to me on a box stock M&P 40 that I was using while teaching a CCW class this weekend. App. 3,000 rounds through the pistol and had it occur 3 times in 200 rounds during the course of the class.
    Sending mine back to S&W- CS Rep didn't sound like this was the first he'd heard of it on a stock .40. Will do a AAR when it is back in my hands.

Page 13 of 91 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •