|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-colu...,7355120.story
What do ya'll think of this?
I think the SWAT members did the right thing. If a dog is aggressive, and it's obvious you can't very easily restrain an animal in a raid, the animal should be shot. The officers needed to get this threat out of the way so as to worry about the perps maybe shooting them. No time to deal humanely with a dog in those circumstances.
Last edited by Cincinnatus; 05-10-10 at 16:20.
"Addressing the problem of shootings by ban or confiscation of non-criminal's guns is like addressing the problem of rape by chopping off the Johnson of everyone who DIDN't rape anyone while not only leaving the rapists' equipment intact, but giving them free viagra to boot." --Me
Member
hold on let me get the popcorn started
Last edited by Cascades236; 05-10-10 at 16:20.
Member
All that for a pipe and a small amount of pot. I cant question what the SWAT guys did on the raid, only the justification for the raid.
Senior Member
Bloody hellthis again
"Intelligence is not the ability to regurgitate information. It is the ability to make sound decisions on a consistent basis "--me
"Just remember, when you are talking to the average person, you are talking to a television set"--RDJB
One Big Ass Mistake America
Senior Member
Enough already...
MossieTactics.com ~ KMA 367
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks