Originally Posted by
Icculus
So I've been doing a lot of reading lately about FFP and SFP, the differences, and pros and cons of each in different scenarios. The idea of the reticle being in both focal planes and changing based on magnification just hurts my head to think about though. I looked at Premier Reticles pdf's but it didn't go in to much depth on how this works. Do you guys know of any other good documentation on how this works or can one of you perhaps explain it in a way that doesn't cause my brain to start bleeding? Thanks
Jim,
How do you feel about the Horus reticles then, if the Mil dot can get busy?
I assume you've used the S&B, Premier and Leupold contenders for the new 1-8 optics. They all seem similar, but it seems the biggest advantage the Leupold has is its turrets with there no-move till you squeeze feature- would you say that's true- or is it something else that seems to make the Leupold the one to beat?
Just trying to figure out if it would be better to just go with a 1.8-10USO or a NIghtforce 2-10 and a T-1 offset. The first way is about the same cash, the second is cheaper.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks