Page 4 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 184

Thread: Draco as an SBR?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    6,533
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Underfolding stocked AK's were designed to allow a trooper to get in and out of his BMP or T-54 quickly, but they suck as firing platforms.
    Employee of colonialshooting.com

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,642
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm looking at doing an SBR on my Draco, but I have a thing for the AKS-74 triangle sidefolder. I found one at last, but the rivet pattern is different than the pistol trunnion in the Draco (which seems to be the same as an underfolder). Is it a big deal to weld-up the old rivet holes and redrill the receiver for the sidefolder trunnion? Or should I have the Draco cut up for parts and go with a dedicated new sidefolder receiver?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,891
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LHS View Post
    Is it a big deal to weld-up the old rivet holes and redrill the receiver for the sidefolder trunnion? Or should I have the Draco cut up for parts and go with a dedicated new sidefolder receiver?
    You'd also have to make the cutouts for the button on the rear trunnion, make the cutout for the latch at the front left of the receiver, drill a hole in front of the magazine well for the latch pin, and drill a hole in the front trunnion for the same pin to go in. Drilling the hole for the latch pin can be challenging because you have to get the angle right and you have to drill on a step in the front trunnion. So yes, it's a pretty difficult thing to do. I did the same thing using a new NoDak Spud receiver that already had all the cuts. Drilling the hole correctly in a Romanian front trunnion was enough for me. Regardless, do cut up the Draco. That would be sad.

    I went to a local gun store today to get a Draco. Since I'd be SBR'ing it, I want one that has all matching numbers on the front trunnion, receiver cover, bolt carrier, and bolt. None of the four they have met this criteria. One had two serial numbers on the bolt carrier, two had receiver covers with a different serial number, and another had a trunnion serial number that was one less than all the other serial numbers on it. All had the underfolder rear trunnions. If you care about matching numbers, then I'd definitely suggest looking at one before you buy.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Henery Co. Ky
    Posts
    41
    Feedback Score
    0
    MINE HAVE ALL MATCHING NUMBERS, I wish I had the underfolder trunnion

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,166
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Templar View Post
    Underfolding stocked AK's were designed to allow a trooper to get in and out of his BMP or T-54 quickly, but they suck as firing platforms.

    Yep. Were it not necessary for my personal Small Arms Museum I wouldn't own any underfolding AKs.

    I'm gonna go full Romanian, here is a mock up of what I'm gonna build.

    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lexington, SC
    Posts
    2,186
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Yep. Were it not necessary for my personal Small Arms Museum I wouldn't own any underfolding AKs.

    I'm gonna go full Romanian, here is a mock up of what I'm gonna build.

    I know that's authentic but it looks like someone fixed their busted stock with the handle from an entrenching tool, and even less practical than the underfolder.

    No offense to those who are into collect-ability and originality, but for this rifle I'm looking for a more practical fighting setup, so in keeping with that and a folder I guess I'm gonna stick with the ACE stock, unless someone throws out a better option.

    I can't wait to SBR mine if it runs well though!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Henery Co. Ky
    Posts
    41
    Feedback Score
    0
    Steyr Aug I have a stock like that and it is very practical.
    I like that idea better than the underfolder, let us know how much trouble it was when your finished.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,891
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RD62 View Post
    I know that's authentic...
    Unfortunately, it's not completely authentic. The authentic stock to go with this SBR is virtually unobtainable.
    Last edited by Bret; 01-03-11 at 20:24.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lexington, SC
    Posts
    2,186
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
    Steyr Aug I have a stock like that and it is very practical.
    I like that idea better than the underfolder, let us know how much trouble it was when your finished.
    No offense intended.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,642
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bret View Post
    You'd also have to make the cutouts for the button on the rear trunnion, make the cutout for the latch at the front left of the receiver, drill a hole in front of the magazine well for the latch pin, and drill a hole in the front trunnion for the same pin to go in. Drilling the hole for the latch pin can be challenging because you have to get the angle right and you have to drill on a step in the front trunnion. So yes, it's a pretty difficult thing to do. I did the same thing using a new NoDak Spud receiver that already had all the cuts. Drilling the hole correctly in a Romanian front trunnion was enough for me. Regardless, do cut up the Draco. That would be sad.

    I went to a local gun store today to get a Draco. Since I'd be SBR'ing it, I want one that has all matching numbers on the front trunnion, receiver cover, bolt carrier, and bolt. None of the four they have met this criteria. One had two serial numbers on the bolt carrier, two had receiver covers with a different serial number, and another had a trunnion serial number that was one less than all the other serial numbers on it. All had the underfolder rear trunnions. If you care about matching numbers, then I'd definitely suggest looking at one before you buy.
    Yep, I'm aware of all the mods that need to be done to the basic receiver to use the triangle stock, but as I have neither the machine tools nor the skill necessary to do it, I'm just going to find a good 'smith to build it for me. That being the case, I was wondering if it would be cheaper in terms of labor to just get a dedicated Nodak sidefolder receiver and have the Draco cut up into parts to mount on it.

Page 4 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •