Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 41 of 41

Thread: QUIETEST Muzzle Break/Comp?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    202
    Feedback Score
    0

    How about this?

    The old BAR used in WWII and Korea had a simple tube about 3" long on the muzzle known as a flash hider rather than a flash suppressor. It did not reduce the noise or flash significantly from the front. However it did help confine the flash, burn more powder in a somewhat confined space and directed a lot of the noise forward.

    Basically, it was a short, larger bore extension of the barrel. A Levang without the front ports. Any time the gases need to go through a smaller hole it seems to intensify the noise though.

    One would eliminate any compensator effect by doing this, but why not have just a straight and unrestricted in any way tube on the end of the barrel that is approximately 1/2" bore by 2" long? Kind of like a rifle barrel with a shotgun muzzle. The bore volume would be increased by about .393 cubic inches which would be equivalent to 8" (.304 cubic inches) of the .220" bore. Thus a 16" carbine with a 2" flash hider would be close to a 24" barrel in bore volume and might sound about the same.
    Last edited by spdldr; 12-10-10 at 20:21.
    Dave

    INNOVATION IS SELDOM ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT CONTROVERSY.
    My first rule of a gunfight, thanks to John Farnam's wise advice. "Get away from there!"

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •