Page 128 of 140 FirstFirst ... 2878118126127128129130138 ... LastLast
Results 1,271 to 1,280 of 1393

Thread: Comparison Chart of Major AR Brands

  1. #1271
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    74
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had a question about barrel steel, and i was wondering if someone could explain. I see the DD barrels state: 4150 CHF. How does that differ from B-11595E steel? I know what the CHF means, just not the difference.
    Thanks,

  2. #1272
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Suwannee Tim View Post
    Agreed on the 6.8 unless you have a 458 handy. So what do these heavier than 70 bullets do out of a 1/9? Poor accuracy? Less than ideal accuracy? Keyhole? I have shot 75s out of a 1/9 with good results but velocity was 3600, somewhat faster than 5.56 can do.
    It's RPM that stabilizes the bullets which is determined by twist and velocity. At 3600 fps, a 1:9 twist will stabilize longer bullets than it will with a velocity of 2900 fps. If the RPM is too slow, the bullet will be unstable and wobble or even keyhole and have a negative impact on accuracy
    Last edited by MistWolf; 12-27-10 at 04:21.

  3. #1273
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    North Florida
    Posts
    2,683
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MistWolf View Post
    It's RPM that stabilizes the bullets which is determined by twist and velocity. At 3600 fps, a 1:9 twist will stabilize longer bullets than it will with a velocity of 2900 fps. If the RPM is too slow, the bullet will be unstable and wobble or even keyhole and have a negative impact on accuracy
    Indeed. I was trying to get the specifics on exactly what occurs, poor accuracy or keyhole but I decided it probably varies depending on exact circumstances. I was shooting a 22/6mm and was getting pretty good results, an inch at 200 and so. One thing that puzzled with one brand of 75 grain bullets was that I never got a 10 shot group. I would shoot 10 times and get 7, 8 or 9 bullet holes. Never 10. Eventually I figured out that the bullets were exploding due to centrifugal force. Loading them down resulted in degraded accuracy.
    Last edited by Suwannee Tim; 12-27-10 at 05:07.

  4. #1274
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    74
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by warlord260 View Post
    I had a question about barrel steel, and i was wondering if someone could explain. I see the DD barrels state: 4150 CHF. How does that differ from B-11595E steel? I know what the CHF means, just not the difference.
    Thanks,
    So DD uses 4150 grade steel, but is it Mil Spec. B1159E steel?

  5. #1275
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    653
    Feedback Score
    0
    Hey Rob,

    Did you ever touch base with Accurate Tool and Rifle reference our discussion?

    Thanks,

    KC

  6. #1276
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pa
    Posts
    23
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I knew that my purchase of a DPMS was lower grade......thanks to this chart I see how very low it is. Oh well, it gives my a target to shoot for when I can afford to upgrade. Thank you very much for all of the information.
    My Grandfather always said; "If your gonna' be stupid, ya' gotta' be tough!"

  7. #1277
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    162
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mechanic87 View Post
    I knew that my purchase of a DPMS was lower grade......thanks to this chart I see how very low it is. Oh well, it gives my a target to shoot for when I can afford to upgrade. Thank you very much for all of the information.
    I don't think there's anything wrong with their lowers, they are made of 7075-T6 like just about everyone else.

  8. #1278
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,851
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    What their made of isn't the issue. It's their tolerances and tolerance stacking. In other words, what DPMS may say is acceptable a higher quality manufacturer would not.

  9. #1279
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    162
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 6933 View Post
    What their made of isn't the issue. It's their tolerances and tolerance stacking. In other words, what DPMS may say is acceptable a higher quality manufacturer would not.
    Got it, didn't know they had spec issues with their lowers.

  10. #1280
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mechanic87 View Post
    I knew that my purchase of a DPMS was lower grade......thanks to this chart I see how very low it is. Oh well, it gives my a target to shoot for when I can afford to upgrade. Thank you very much for all of the information.
    Well, until you do upgrade, there's a lot of things you can do to improve its reliability.

    1) stake your carrier key or buy a BCM/DD/LMT full-auto BCG
    2) stake your castle nut
    3) swap out your buffer for an H buffer
    4) get the chamber reamed out to 5.56
    5) install anti-tilt followers in your magazines or use PMAGs

    Doing these steps should make it run pretty well until you shoot the barrel out or accumulate enough money to upgrade.

Page 128 of 140 FirstFirst ... 2878118126127128129130138 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •