Page 4 of 140 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 1393

Thread: Comparison Chart of Major AR Brands

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by caporider View Post
    Don't the current production 6920s use mil-spec (small) receiver pins? I thought Colt had changed from large pin to small pin a couple of years back.
    This chart refers to fire control group pins.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,216
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Got it - thanks.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    738
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    This chart refers to fire control group pins.
    Just a suggestion- but why not refer to that caption as "FCG Pin Size" rather then "MilsSpec Lower Rec. Pins".
    It would reduce my e mail inbox by about 2%....

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    It's changed on the excel file, but I haven't taken the time to re-generate the .jpg for posting here.

    I was hoping that someone would come along and tell me more ways I was wrong before I re-do it.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    738
    Feedback Score
    0
    I feel your pain Rob!

    The reality is nothing will ever be perfect, and you will see ways to improve it for a long time.
    However, you took the first step and made a chart showing the apparent comparisons between makers guns.
    Bravo Zulu!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    305
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    ...
    I was hoping that someone would come along and tell me more ways I was wrong before I re-do it.
    Still no Noveske N4 Light.
    Aubrey<><

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,023
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Do you consider this chart "ready for prime time" yet? I will be using it from now on as a quick and tidy answer when the inevitible questions occur on the few forums I post on.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    The technical information appears to be correct so far.

    I was kind of hoping that Randall would post it on arfcom again so that we could watch the hysteria there and weed out the BS, but since I put "m4carbine.net" on it they probably won't allow it to be posted.

    I'm banned from most places that I'd post it to test the waters. Those include
    ar15.com
    1911forums.com (we had a good result there last time it was posted)
    10-8forums.com

    I think I might cruise over to thehighroad.org and post it for them and see what kind of response I get.

    ETA:
    Posted to THR here

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,023
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    The next time "the issue" comes up on AK Forums I'll link to it there. I also post sometimes on PAFOA (Pennsylvania forum).

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,111
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    I was kind of hoping that Randall would post it on arfcom again so that we could watch the hysteria there and weed out the BS, but since I put "m4carbine.net" on it they probably won't allow it to be posted.

    I'm banned from most places that I'd post it to test the waters. Those include
    ar15.com
    1911forums.com (we had a good result there last time it was posted)
    10-8forums.com
    I put it up on arfcom and 10-8.
    Randall Rausch
    AR15 Barrel Guru

Page 4 of 140 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •