Got it - thanks.
It's changed on the excel file, but I haven't taken the time to re-generate the .jpg for posting here.
I was hoping that someone would come along and tell me more ways I was wrong before I re-do it.
I feel your pain Rob!
The reality is nothing will ever be perfect, and you will see ways to improve it for a long time.
However, you took the first step and made a chart showing the apparent comparisons between makers guns.
Bravo Zulu!
Do you consider this chart "ready for prime time" yet? I will be using it from now on as a quick and tidy answer when the inevitible questions occur on the few forums I post on.
The technical information appears to be correct so far.
I was kind of hoping that Randall would post it on arfcom again so that we could watch the hysteria there and weed out the BS, but since I put "m4carbine.net" on it they probably won't allow it to be posted.
I'm banned from most places that I'd post it to test the waters. Those include
ar15.com
1911forums.com (we had a good result there last time it was posted)
10-8forums.com
I think I might cruise over to thehighroad.org and post it for them and see what kind of response I get.
ETA:
Posted to THR here
The next time "the issue" comes up on AK Forums I'll link to it there. I also post sometimes on PAFOA (Pennsylvania forum).
Bookmarks