Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: REVIEW: LAR Grizzly OPS-4 Upper Receiver

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    318
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dennisuello View Post
    I think his point is that locktite in that application is not ideal, as the heat will render it nearly useless. But if you were to use high temp permanent locktite, how would you remove the bolt?
    I've had a Y/M side charge upper for a few years. No loctite and it's never come loose.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,928
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by dennisuello View Post
    I think his point is that locktite in that application is not ideal, as the heat will render it nearly useless. But if you were to use high temp permanent locktite, how would you remove the bolt?
    If it were me, I would make it captive by making the root a big square that bears against the bottom of the opening and make it so it can only be unscrewed in its rearmost position when the recievers were open, I.E. in a location beyond the rearmost travel of the bolt carrier during a normal recoil stroke.

    I would also make sure the engagement was generous enough that you could not curb-stomp it and strip the threads or bend the handle in any way, shape, manner or form.

    I do find this concept intriguing (The right-side charger) but I am afraid is simply is not sufficiently robust for heavy-duty use in it's current incarnation.

    A version with the above mods and an AR-18 type dust-cover would have potential for real-world, two-way range type use.
    Last edited by Heavy Metal; 12-23-10 at 21:43.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL.
    Posts
    2,395
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    How do you remove the bolt if the side charging handle has loc-tite applied to it?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    318
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nickdrak View Post
    How do you remove the bolt if the side charging handle has loc-tite applied to it?
    By using blue instead of red.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    318
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Metal View Post
    If it were me, I would make it captive by making the root a big square that bears against the bottom of the opening and make it so it can only be unscrewed in its rearmost position when the recievers were open, I.E. in a location beyond the rearmost travel of the bolt carrier during a normal recoil stroke.

    I would also make sure the engagement was generous enough that you could not curb-stomp it and strip the threads or bend the handle in any way, shape, manner or form.

    I do find this concept intriguing (The right-side charger) but I am afraid is simply is not sufficiently robust for heavy-duty use in it's current incarnation.

    A version with the above mods and an AR-18 type dust-cover would have potential for real-world, two-way range type use.
    Although I understand your points, I think you're way over thinking this. Can you curb stomp a standard AR charging handle and not screw it up? No, you can't. Does that mean it's not robust enough for heavy duty use too?

    Get your hands on one of these and check it out for yourself. They are solid. I've been told that the Las Vegas Police ordered 300 LAR rifles with these uppers.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,928
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    When the AR CH is fully in-battery? It would be hard to curb-stomp it.

    Having to rely on an adhesive to keep a field-grade weapon servicable is simply unsat. That assembly needs to be captive and I can think of at least two ways to make it such. The first one I mentioned, the second one would be to more or less directly copy the Daewoo with a captive dovetail root.

    The problem with the Daewoo solution is it would move the root of the CH to the top of the ejection port and move the handle closer to the accessory rail. The solution I proposed would require only a slightly larger hole at the end of the slot to allow rotation and a square root for the handle(and I would go ahead and use a larger diameter threaded portion(journal,shank, root, whatever you want to call it) while I was at it). This would also totally eliminate the need for any adhesives.

    This is fine for a Three-Gun rig but a more robust solution is needed if you are going to market this to the two-way shooter crowd.

    Loctite is fine for static assemblies but this is not a static assembly.
    Last edited by Heavy Metal; 12-23-10 at 22:05.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    318
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Metal View Post
    When the AR CH is fully in-battery? It would be hard to curb-stomp it.

    Having to rely on an adhesive to keep a field-grade weapon servicable is simply unsat. That assembly needs to be captive and I can think of at least two ways to make it such. The first one I mentioned, the second one would be to more or less directly copy the Daewoo with a captive dovetail root.

    The problem with the Daewoo solution is it would move the root of the CH to the top of the ejection port and move the handle closer to the accessory rail. The solution I proposed would require only a slightly larger hole at the end of the slot to allow rotation and a square root for the handle(and I would go ahead and use a larger diameter threaded portion(journal,shank, root, whatever you want to call it) while I was at it). This would also totally eliminate the need for any adhesives.

    This is fine for a Three-Gun rig but a more robust solution is needed if you are going to market this to the two-way shooter crowd.

    Loctite is fine for static assemblies but this is not a static assembly.
    Contact the manufacturer. Maybe you can make some money off it.

    http://www.largrizzly.com/web/guest/contactus

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,928
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I did look at the videos on your website.

    There is some good thinking in this. The dual-sided version does not interest me simply because it exposes too much area to the intrusion of debris. I like the sand cuts, however.

    I think the idea has some potential but needs that extra 10% of attention to address some murphy-proofing issues in order to take it beyond the competetion arena.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Free State of Nebraska
    Posts
    5,441
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    What is the point of all this?
    "Not every thing on Earth requires an aftermarket upgrade." demigod/markm

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    186
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I don't understand the point of the threaded plug. Why not just keep the standard charging handle in place there?

    And staking a gas key has nothing to do with preventing purposeful removal. I think you know that.

    You say the y/m is just modifying parts while this is much different from the ground up. I'm not seeing any significant differences. They appear to function exactly the same using the exact same knob and placement and receiver.

    So you put loctite on the charging knob threads and tighten with a wrench. Now you get to carry a wrench a bottle of loctite with your rifle everywhere, anytime you want to simply service your rifle and remove the carrier (since that big knob otherwise prevents a simple removal). This is worlds different from pushing a takedown pin and simply pulling your normal charging handle to remove the carrier.

    No different than other side chargers already on the market. I guess some think they're cool but I fail to see any practicality.
    Last edited by Sanpete; 12-24-10 at 09:59.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •