Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Odd headstamps on old M193

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Way out!
    Posts
    170
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Question Odd headstamps on old M193

    I was sorting through a can of M193 ammo that I have had for about twenty years and discovered some very odd headstamps on some of the rounds. The ones that were normal were stamped LC 89 and had the NATO cross. What I can't explain were the LC73, LC75, LC77, LC87, RA67, and TW72, none of which had the NATO cross, but did have five dots stamped around the circumference. Too, all of these rounds were packed on USGI stripper clips. Can anyone tell me what the heck I have here?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    LC = Lake City
    RA = Remington Arms
    TW = Twin Cities
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Central NY
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    81 (100%)
    Here is a good link with lots of good Info !! Robb Nailed it !!!
    http://cartridgecollectors.org/headstampcodes.htm

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Way out!
    Posts
    170
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb Jensen View Post
    LC = Lake City
    RA = Remington Arms
    TW = Twin Cities
    Thanks Robb, but I knew that much. The main thing that struck me as odd, was the lack of the NATO cross on G.I. ammo. Got an explanation for that? Was the ammo not NATO standardized until after this stuff was made?
    Last edited by M90A1; 01-02-11 at 21:55.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    The 5.56x45mm NATO didn't become a NATO round until sometime in the 70s or 80s.
    IIRC the M193 wasn't ever a NATO cartridge. The first US 5.56mm NATO cartridge was the M855 and then the M856.
    The M856 needed 1x7 twist barrels to stabilize out of M249s and then they used 1x7 in the M16A2 when the USMC helped develop it.
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    206
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm not real sure, but I don't think NATO ever standardized the M193 ball ammo, like they did the M855.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Way out!
    Posts
    170
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Robb Jensen View Post
    The 5.56x45mm NATO didn't become a NATO round until sometime in the 70s or 80s.
    IIRC the M193 wasn't ever a NATO cartridge. The first US 5.56mm NATO cartridge was the M855 and then the M856.
    The M856 needed 1x7 twist barrels to stabilize out of M249s and then they used 1x7 in the M16A2 when the USMC helped develop it.
    Now that I can understand. But, that then begs the question of why the LC89 M193 has the NATO cross. I think I'll just shoot it and not worry about it. Thanks for the replies.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by M90A1 View Post
    Now that I can understand. But, that then begs the question of why the LC89 M193 has the NATO cross. I think I'll just shoot it and not worry about it. Thanks for the replies.
    LC makes most of the 5.56mm brass used by the US Mil so they probably used brass that was really destined for M855.

    I have a small amount of BH Mk262 that's in WCC brass.
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Way out!
    Posts
    170
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by Robb Jensen View Post
    LC makes most of the 5.56mm brass used by the US Mil so they probably used brass that was really destined for M855.

    I have a small amount of BH Mk262 that's in WCC brass.
    Duh(slaps head)! Why do the simplest explanations escape me? I guess it would make sense to have one stamp rather than two. Thanks again. (slinks off to corner)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,892
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Yep. You'll find XM193 with NATO crosses on the headstamp. It's not NATO ammo.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •