Roger, good to know. At least they are quick to follow up after you submit updated paperwork, etc.
It was my understanding that if you are going to a shorter barrel than what was registered that you were required to notify that ATF and update your form to the shorter barrel... I guess it was bad information if you are saying that there is no need to do so...
So your saying that if you have a 14.5 on your paperwork and go to a 10.5 there are no issues in doing so?
Oh okay, i am unsure either way, I am learning more and more the further this thread goes. Ill see if i can find the magazine i read that in and ill post it up.
The ATF requires you to notify them with a letter if you permanently alter the configuration of your SBR with respect to the barrel length. A temporary change (who is ever going to know?) is ok.
Vince
This is not true by the way. One SBR is not 'more' NFA than another. They are all the same, thus any NFA registered weapon can have any length of barrel you want on it and like bkb0000 and donr101395 said there is no definition of temporary nor would anyone ever know how long the 'other' length barrel has been on the rifle.
The entire law has always been difficult to interpret and thus is a poor law. Maybe I'll become a senator one day and fix it up.
Okay so i found the magazine i read my earlier info. in...BLACK GUNS 2011. The column writer is Jeremy D.Clough, He goes through and documents the entire process... he states and i quote "As another word of warning, its worth noting that with a platform as modular as the AR15, "manufacturing" an SBR is as simple as pulling two pins and putting a short upper on your regular lower reciever. If you do that,even if you just want to see what one would look like on your rifle, you've just manufactured a class III weapon,and you're in violation of federal law. Similarily,if you if you possess an upper with a barrel shorter than 16",and you have a lower that it is physically possible for it to be assembled on, but which is NOT a registered SBR, you're in violation. Likewise,if you have a pistoland a shoulder stock that fits it-such as a stock for a glock-you're breaking the law. The same goes for vertical foregrips on handguns,such as putting a GriPod or Crimson Trace MVF on an AR pistol". And it goes on to tell how the same rules apply for individual LEO's and "Although the legal description for an SBR doesnt include the same exact language, the statue that defines a machinegun (which,like the SBR, is a class III weapon), includes any combination of parts that can be assembled to create one." " I expect the same reasoning to apply to combinations of parts that can be used to create an SBR,so if you don't have a lower that the upper can legally be mated with- such as an SBR or a registered pistol lower- you shouldn't have an upper with a barrel less than 16''. Again, I want to make it clear I wasnt saying anyone was wrong...i just heard two different things and wanted to let you guys know as well.
Bookmarks