Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 88

Thread: Barrels 101

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    47
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Well it depends on several things. For instance, a 1/7 twist barrel shoots 55gr ammo very well to about 100yds. Past that we see the groups open up a lot. Same with the 1/9 twist barrels. At about 100yds, 75/77gr ammo does pretty well, but as you go farther out, your group sizes can open up.

    So if you want to shoot heavier grain bullets at distances over 100yds, stick with a 1/7 twist barrel (which is what I shoot).


    C4
    Thanks, that makes sense. I'm not planning to go long with the carbine and will be looking at .308 for that purpose some time later (and that opens another set of questions but probably for a different board )

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    5,963
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Bump...

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Midland, Georgia
    Posts
    2,063
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,863
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    this should be stickied without a doubt.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    5,152
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by K.L. Davis View Post
    Inconel

    seems that 4150/CMV is hard to beat for the platform...
    Knowing how much an Inconel exhaust valve costs, I can only imagine how much an Inconel barrel would be lol.

    Awesome post, very informative! Thank you

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sopines, NC
    Posts
    1,759
    Feedback Score
    52 (100%)
    Thanks for the writeup; very informative and concise.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    173
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by eternal24k View Post
    this should be stickied without a doubt.
    [light-hearted jab made in jest] And finished, too.[/light-hearted jab]

    Those are very interesting articles. I'd like to track down the other articles in the series. Thank you for posting those up.


    A few months ago I researched barrels for my first build project. I scoured the Internet almost daily for several months before finally making a decision. Even though my research led me to M4C numerous times - sometimes to threads I had already visited several times - I never recall seeing this thread. I think I can work The Google pretty well, and thought my search terms within applicable topics were widely varied. Dang. My own process could have been much simpler if I had only discovered this thread first.

    Thanks you for your time and info, Mr. Davis.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    233
    Feedback Score
    0
    Would it be an exaggeration to suggest that the steels that are easiest to rifle by single-point cutters and broaches are also the fastest to wear out from use? The introduction of button rifling and then cold-hammer forged rifling offered the ability to economically rifle harder steels.

    The ironic thing is that several Fudd rifle companies were using CHF barrels nearly four decades ago. Back in February 1971, "American Rifleman" ran the second of a three-part article by Jac Weller on the construction techniques used by US firearm manufacturers. Remington, Ruger, Weatherby, and Winchester were all cited as using CHF barrels for at least some calibers and models.

    According to Roy Weatherby's biography, he was using CHF barrels in his Mark V rifles as early as 1959. (They were made by Sauer at the time.)

    In his 1977 book "American Rifle Design and Performance", L.R. Wallack noted that Winchester was still producing CHF barrels, and their representatives had even claimed that they were the only major sporting arm manufacturer to chamber their barrels in the same process.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    233
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by hikeeba View Post
    Those are very interesting articles. I'd like to track down the other articles in the series. Thank you for posting those up.
    The other CHF articles can be found here:

    http://technology.calumet.purdue.edu/met/higley/

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    368
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dewatters View Post
    Would it be an exaggeration to suggest that the steels that are easiest to rifle by single-point cutters and broaches are also the fastest to wear out from use? The introduction of button rifling and then cold-hammer forged rifling offered the ability to economically rifle harder steels.

    Actually, barrels that are button rifled or hammer forged have to start out softer in order to be rifled. In the articles posted above about hammer forging, the author stated that the blanks are around 24-25rc before going in to the hammer forge machine, then come out of the machine about 30rc. I believe that button rifling will also work harden the bore.

    A Kreiger or Obermeyer cut rifled barrel will also be around 28-30rc. Alot of high power and benchrest shooters say that cut rifled barrels last longer than buttoned.
    Last edited by sniperfrog; 07-19-10 at 11:23.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •