Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: "titanium" plate fraud

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,928
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Abraxas View Post
    Is titanium really that weak of a material? Not being any kind of metallurgist I have always been under the impression that it is an incredibly strong material.
    Titanium is lighter than Steel and stronger than Aluminum.

    It is not, however, lighter than Aluminum and stronger than Steel.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    992
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Abraxas View Post
    So what you are saying is it is a weight to strength ratio kind of thing with a high temperature tolerance. So then why are drill bits coated in Ti if steel is still stronger? Is it because of the heat generated by drilling?
    More bullshit marketing. Drill bits are coated with titanium nitride.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California (a giant failed social experiment)
    Posts
    25
    Feedback Score
    0
    Wow. Just when I thought this thread had exhausted it's possibilities. Some of what has been discussed about titanium I learned after this whole ordeal about the plates. I've also learned alot about the ballistic threat levels because of this. In answer to why I shot the plates before returning them, Doc had it closest. When I shot them, I was angry and wanted to make the point. The point I wanted to make was that the plates were not what they were advertised to be or would not do what they were advertised to do. Also, at the time it didn't sound like I was going to get a refund. So I shot them to make my point. When I told both the vendor and manufacturer I shot them, and what the results were, the refund/return deal got worked out.

    I didn't buy them to put on display or wear for a paitball game on the weekend. I bought them because I intend to strap them over my internal organs in case I have to face some nut with a long gun. Having said that, I should have dome my homework better and been less trusting. Slick advertising or fraud, call it what you will.
    "Mongo only pawn in game of life"

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    "Slick advertising or fraud?
    BOTH!!!

    The plates were not constructed as advertised and did not stop the threats the vendor claimed they would.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,097
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sadly this kind of thing appears to be pretty common in the armor industry.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    3,921
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dano5326 View Post
    I would certainly not call this fraud. Slick marketing perhaps.

    Does it stop the threat level or not? Meet size weight specs?

    A company can call them ninja plates if they wish...

    Clearly buyer unfamiliar with industry materials and practices. .25" titanium wouldn't stop any rifle threat and wouldn't weigh much.
    Excuse my language, but but you are abso-****ing-lutely correct. Titanium it's self is not some magic element that will stop any and everything. Plain old 4340 steel of comparable thickness has far better ballistic defeating properties than titanium. Further, you are absolutely correct about everything else. I mean, hell I have seen all sorts of products with the word "titanium" in the name. Hell, it sounds cool and that's what marketing and advertising is all about.

    Not only have I witnessed first hand the ability of an E-SAPI plate to defeat a non-AP rifle round (Iraq 2006), but I now work for a company that does (among many other things) 3rd party certification of ballistic plates and armor coupons as per DOJ standards. We also do some PPE development and product improvement design.

    It is important to understand what the different threat defeat levels actually mean, and to purchase these things from reputable vendors and manufacturers. I have seen and tested plates that carried manufacturing flaws that would have caused them to fail and not be effective at the advertised threat level. It is one of those things where QA/QC is CRITICAL and you have a far less chance of getting a "dud" if you go with a reputable brand name company.

    YMMV and all that.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redmanfms View Post
    Sadly this kind of thing appears to be pretty common in the armor industry.
    Actually, it's probably better today than 10-20 years ago. There certainly seems to be a bit more knowledge out there now then when I was issued my first vest.

    It had a label on it that said it was rated for ".38 Special, 9mm, .357 Magnum, .45 Auto, and .44 Magnum".

    No velocities, no bullet types, no testing certifications, etc. I asked our equipment guy which ones it would stop. He didn't have a clue.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Hint--Just because a vendor has a lot of advertising or significant brand recognition does NOT mean that it is a "reputable brand name company". Look for open, honest, thorough test results, along with ethical behavior and a true concern for end users--not just lip service...

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    Marketing your vests as bronze, silver, gold, or platinum is fine. Titanium is actually a metal used in some high end armor. It is misleading to use that name for armor that does not contain it. It would be like selling a gem as diamond then say you did not mean it was actually diamond but just a marketing term.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Hint--Just because a vendor has a lot of advertising or significant brand recognition does NOT mean that it is a "reputable brand name company". Look for open, honest, thorough test results, along with ethical behavior and a true concern for end users--not just lip service...
    Good point.

    It wasn't too many years ago when one of the largest vest companies was marketing a vest, that had extra layers of material, right where HP White shot it during testing. The rest of the vest feathered down to less layers, for "comfort". They brought it out to our department, and we said thanks, but no thanks. Lots of other departments bought it though.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •