Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: What do you consider enough lumens?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    IN
    Posts
    1,790
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)

    What do you consider enough lumens?

    I posted a response to a thread on another forum (hint..rymes with barf) to the question in the title.

    I responded with a good rule of thumb is:
    2 lumens per yard to IDENTIFY
    1 lumen per yard to OBSERVE

    Example: 120 lumens would give you aprox 60 yards to identify a target and be able to engage that target with cerntainty and aprox 120 yards of light to observe a target only.

    This was the rule of thumb given to me at a low light/no light class taught by LMS Defense.

    One of the responses I got was...that I was an idiot and didn't know what I was talking about. I brushed it off and didn't even respond as I trust my source.

    So what say you, what do you consider enough lumens?

    ETA: Assuming these are tactical weapon mounted lights. I assume most tactical oriented lights are going to have similar beam profiles given their intended use.
    Last edited by rushca01; 04-21-11 at 12:08.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    438
    Feedback Score
    0
    Depends entirely on the beam profile. 120 decently focused lumens can work very well. 120 floody lumens are useless for anything except looking for scorpions in the garden. Lumens just measures total output out the front, it doesn't account for the beam profile.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    266
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by joffe View Post
    Depends entirely on the beam profile. 120 decently focused lumens can work very well. 120 floody lumens are useless for anything except looking for scorpions in the garden. Lumens just measures total output out the front, it doesn't account for the beam profile.
    +1

    Also take into account whether the light will be used indoors or outdoors. 80 lumens is more than enough indoors, however, fall short outdoors.

    I have two bulbs for my 6P now, 80 lumens indoors and 400 outdoors. Brighter isn't better.
    Kentucky Regional Training Group

    Shot placement is power- Stephen A. Camp

    I'm aware my avvy does not stand for Heckler and Koch

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,714
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by joffe View Post
    Depends entirely on the beam profile. 120 decently focused lumens can work very well. 120 floody lumens are useless for anything except looking for scorpions in the garden. Lumens just measures total output out the front, it doesn't account for the beam profile.
    this may be technically correct but it does little to advance the discussion.

    as far as someone having gone so far as to quantify lumens, if they have some rationale behind their opinion, I might be willing to accept it until I or someone else proves otherwise.

    as for how much is "enough", I don't know but some folks have claimed the 65 lumens of the SF incandescent is all you need indoors and that too much light is not beneficial. I can understand their argument , however, speaking only from personal experience, I've never felt the need for "less" light (except for close detail use), so my answer would have to be the more the better. referring back to your statement I prefer a "floody" profile with lots of lumens to brighten the spill.

    the Streamlight TLR 1s with its 160 lumens should be an improvement in throw over the TLR @135 lumens but at the expense of a tighter hotspot and spill. I have both and the difference is mostly academic.
    never push a wrench...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Allentown, PA
    Posts
    3,422
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    I think that this may need to be narrowed down a bit....
    Are you talking about a weapon mounted light? If so, in my opinion, a super bright cornea burning light is not necessary. Weapon mounted lights are solely for identifying a target before engaging it (or not engaging it). You are not supposed to "search" for a target with your weapon light. All of my rifles are equipped with Surefire G2 lights on VTac mounts. They work for me and are quality lights. The price is right too. I have TLR1s lights on my handguns. Again, they work for me and the price is right.
    If you are talking about a hand held light to search for people or items than I believe that your original statement is spot on.
    Remember, when you are in a situation where you are searching for a bad guy in the dark, night vision (natural not electronic) and the ability to not give away your position are more important than how super bright your light is.
    "Perfect Practice Makes Perfect"
    "There are 550 million firearms on this planet. That's one firearm for every 12 people. The question is... How do we arm the other 11?" Lord of War.
    "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." Thomas Jefferson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    268
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by joffe View Post
    Depends entirely on the beam profile. 120 decently focused lumens can work very well. 120 floody lumens are useless for anything except looking for scorpions in the garden. Lumens just measures total output out the front, it doesn't account for the beam profile.
    This contributes A LOT to the discussion, and I'm not sure why ra2bach feels otherwise.

    I had a Fenix TK35 which uses and Cree XM-L and puts out 800+ lumens, but other lights I've had which use smaller, less powerful emitters in deeper more focused reflectors threw light further. I think flood/spill vs. throw is a far more important factor to consider when picking a light for a certain application than lumen output.

    A high lumen (300+), floody beam is great for searching outdoors in a tightly packed neighborhood, but worthless in a more open area where a light with lower lumens but a tighter reflector would rule. And neither one of those lights would be ideal indoors. Ambient light plays into all of this as well.

    To me, the most well rounded type of light is one where there is a primary switch for on and off, and a separate switch or mode ring for changing brightness. That way, you can adjust ahead of time if you know if you are going to be inside or outside, but there are no worries about having to cycle through modes to get to what you want.

    That said, for work (patrol cop) I tend to stick with single mode lights for simplicity. And when stuck with only one mode, I would rather deal with the disadvantages of light that is TOO bright for certain situations than a light which isn't bright enough. If I wash out my vision with too much light, I can generally rest assured that anyone on the other end is feeling it far worse than I am.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    438
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by toasterlocker View Post
    This contributes A LOT to the discussion, and I'm not sure why ra2bach feels otherwise.

    I had a Fenix TK35 which uses and Cree XM-L and puts out 800+ lumens, but other lights I've had which use smaller, less powerful emitters in deeper more focused reflectors threw light further. I think flood/spill vs. throw is a far more important factor to consider when picking a light for a certain application than lumen output.

    A high lumen (300+), floody beam is great for searching outdoors in a tightly packed neighborhood, but worthless in a more open area where a light with lower lumens but a tighter reflector would rule. And neither one of those lights would be ideal indoors. Ambient light plays into all of this as well.

    To me, the most well rounded type of light is one where there is a primary switch for on and off, and a separate switch or mode ring for changing brightness. That way, you can adjust ahead of time if you know if you are going to be inside or outside, but there are no worries about having to cycle through modes to get to what you want.

    That said, for work (patrol cop) I tend to stick with single mode lights for simplicity. And when stuck with only one mode, I would rather deal with the disadvantages of light that is TOO bright for certain situations than a light which isn't bright enough. If I wash out my vision with too much light, I can generally rest assured that anyone on the other end is feeling it far worse than I am.
    Having two switches does work well, but I personally feel that an even more useful configuration is the two-stage switch, as seen in the A2 Aviator and LX2 from Surefire. A slight press gives you a low beam, and fully depressing gives full output. (twisting will give constant-on in both levels, like the standard SF momentary switch) Impossible to mess up, unlike the morse code clicking lights that cycle through modes, and no problem to operate with one hand or under stress, which might be a problem with a 'dial' type light like the U2.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,131
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)
    I think everyone here has pretty valid points.

    Personally, I try to keep things simple. No cycle light modes, twist for a certain output, ect...click/momentary on is the way to go.

    For outdoors I think that more is better...with a focused beam of at least 120 lumens...that said, I don't know if I would ever use a light to ID and shoot/no shoot a BG anyway at a range more than about 60+ yds...any further than that, its probly just best to E&E anyway...I'm not military so....

    For indoors, it would obviously be more crucial to have light discipline so as not to wash out your night vision or give away your position. Like posted above, you shouldn't be "searching" with a light anyway. That said, I would still stick with a light about 120 lumens...

    I know most here have experience some form of low light training, but if you haven't, I can tell you from my experience that 120 lumens hitting you in the eyes from close range will literally blind you for about 3 seconds...which is a LONG time...and impare your nv for even longer...using a light properly will increase your chance of survival in a low light incident exponentially.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Lone Star State
    Posts
    985
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I did low light training a few days ago. I ran my X300 (tested 210 OTF lumens; https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=55402 ) on my carbine. At 50 yards it was difficult at times to determine if the target was a threat or not. At that point I was behind a barricade giving verbal commands. Realistically where I patrol taking a 50 yard shot is risky anyway but if it has to be done, it has to be done. It got easier to see as I closed in but that's given.
    It also depends on the quality of your vision as well. So how much is enough? Even 210 measured lumens is not enough for me at 50 yards.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    2,345
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by toasterlocker View Post
    To me, the most well rounded type of light is one where there is a primary switch for on and off, and a separate switch or mode ring for changing brightness.
    +1

    My Fenix handheld works this way, and it's the most user-friendly light I have ever used.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •