Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 183

Thread: NEW Comparison Chart of Commercial M4 Pattern Carbines

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by badness View Post
    what does the "1" stand for under spikes tactical's MPI barrel testing? Does that mean they only test 1 per batch? Or was that ment to be 100% but a mistake was made?

    I ask because under HPT Bolt testing for SIONICS, you put Samples, so if spikes only takes batch or sample testing for their MPI barrel tests, i assumed it would say the same. (Samples).
    Just like the bolt issue, it was simply a formatting problem.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    3,704
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    no.

    ..
    Not for commercial sales.

    Great job on the new chart Rob. There will of course be no shortage of naysayers and criticism, but such is life on the internet!

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    903
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    Do they make an M4?
    An M4 doesn't have a 16" barrel.

    Useful specifications to have nonetheless for those purchasing 14.5" and 16" midlengths. Thanks for taking time to put this together.
    Last edited by Boss Hogg; 06-10-11 at 16:24.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    596
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    Just like the bolt issue, it was simply a formatting problem.
    ok. Thanks for the time consuming work involved with putting this together....


    Again.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Metairie, LA
    Posts
    32
    Feedback Score
    0
    Is this going to be published in Google Docs rather than just public?
    Last edited by CRab; 06-10-11 at 18:54.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NorthWest USA
    Posts
    704
    Feedback Score
    0
    Excellent work Rob! Thanks again for sharing all your hard work.
    US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    78
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for all of your hard work Rob.
    lol already people bitching about it on Glock Talk (no surprise though).

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    NOLA
    Posts
    89
    Feedback Score
    35 (100%)

    Just some hard-earned appreciation

    Rob, thank you for all of your diligence and hard work put into this new chart. Having used the old one as a noob, I know that this will be a very valuable resource for those in the future that are looking at becoming a part of our community. I also copy and pasted the chart and e of f together into one rather large jpeg if anyone needs it while they are offline. You can message me and I will email it to you if anyone wants it.

    Thanks again Rob!

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    7,868
    Feedback Score
    0
    Did Stag step up their game?...
    We miss you, AC.
    We miss you, ToddG.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Magic_Salad0892 View Post
    Did Stag step up their game?...
    Everyone did.

    The chart might as well remove Sionics and say "Here is a list of all manufacturers that produce mil-spec AR15s."

    It would be easier than listing all the materials, production methods, inspection processes etc. The chart and its subsequent aftermath on forums like this has made producing a 1/9 twist bbl, non-HP/MPI tested bolt AR15 bad business sense.

    So now, in essence, we just have a chart where everything is 95%+ the same.
    Why do the loudest do the least?

Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •