G&R Tactical
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: What's up with the new trend of "rail-ready" forearm/handguard?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I don't care for rails on my forearm. If I can mount what I want on my rifle without rails, I'd be happy. I do want the advantage of a free float tube, but most have too large a diameter. I also prefer the protection from heat carbon fiber offers. I like how the PRI Delta carbon fiber forearm fits my hand so that's what I went with although it's pricey.

    A move away from quad rails a fad? Unlikely. I think it's more of a practical choice as I feel quad rails are a specialized piece of equipment. Most don't need that much rail estate
    Last edited by MistWolf; 06-13-11 at 03:56.
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    That's being an American. Helping others because you want to, not because "Big Brother" forces you to
    I am American

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    As we say there is no free lunch. Free-float rails will obviously provide some measure of increased accuracy, although that is just a piece of the puzzle.

    Some rails are better than others and all of them will have an advantage/ disadvantage. I really like the Centurion Arms rail for a variety of reasons. It's slimmer, it feels lighter and more user friendly when it comes to installation.

    Rails like the Troy TRX are also a good option. Slimmer profile, rails where you need them, lower cost, etc... The real test is how will they hold up over time and after being abused. That is something that people need to take into account. DD rails are solid, and though they may be "bulky" in some minds they are also "grunt" proof which is a necessity.

    In the end if you don't want rails and you only mount a light and sling and can get away with a particular set up then by all means do so.

    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    SE FL
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)

    some clarifications...

    The MOE is not "lighter". In fact, most quality handguards, 4-rail, 1-rail, or smooth, weigh less than most plastic handguards once you take the full mounting system into account. Stock barrel nuts and delta rings are heavy, relatively speaking.

    1-side or smooth tubes do start out life lighter, but as you add rail sections they add up very, very quickly. This is due in part to the fact that in the mounting surface area you now have twice as much metal as you would in a dedicated 4-rail setup.

    This is where, provided you don't want or need QD, the Mount-N-Slot products are great as they eliminate the need for redundant metal such as the rail section and tend to be lighter overall than a throw-lever mount because it has less moving parts.
    Last edited by rob_s; 06-13-11 at 05:50.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmaster-M4A3 View Post
    Is this a better solution? Or just another trend?
    A little of both. There's no question that the AR aftermarket nonsense has become like the custom motorcycle world... but there is something to be said for not needing 48" of total rail space when 6" will do.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts