Page 22 of 50 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 493

Thread: S&W Melonite coated barrel vs Noveske chrome lined barrel.

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    903
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    With the improvements in metallurgy and coatings in recent years, I predict the AR market is going to see a gradual move away from chrome lining. If you can get similar barrel life, and a 30 to 50% improvement in accuracy, what's not to like?

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,757
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Any tests to demonstrate the difference in accuracy?

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not that I know of.

    I am not a big believer in chrome harming accuracy much. But it can't help, that is for sure.

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,757
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    30-50% quoted is a heck of a difference IF we mean reducing 2" groups to 1-1.4" at 100 yards. Nothing to sneeze at for longer distances, although in combat shooting likely not a big deal. I'm from Missouri on this one.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    929
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss Hogg View Post
    With the improvements in metallurgy and coatings in recent years, I predict the AR market is going to see a gradual move away from chrome lining. If you can get similar barrel life, and a 30 to 50% improvement in accuracy, what's not to like?
    I agree and the think the moving has already started.

    Also, I won't claim any accuracy % differences but it has definately been my experience that unlined barrels shoot better. Of course this is with a small sample (maybe 15 lined, 8 unlined) and the only constant variable was that the same ammo was used.

    The accuracy difference wouldnt normally be a big deal but when ringing my 2/3 IDPA steel over 400yards it's pretty significant.

    BTW: is the MK12 CL CMV or stainless?

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Smith and Wesson barrels also have 5R rifling, which is supposed to provide a better gas seal for improved velocity. The lands on 5R rifling are contoured, which reduces fouling and improves accuracy. I suspect that the differences are relatively small, but the combination of increased barrel life, increased velocity and greater accuracy is nice.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,757
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    It would be nice to see this Smith with a lightweight barrel profile. It would be very lightweight.

    Who else is using this barrel treatment now, moving away from chrome?

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Medina, Ohio
    Posts
    650
    Feedback Score
    0
    either way ill SBN this barrel, but what barrel should i get?

    so... should i buy hammer forged 1/7
    http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-B...d-16%20bfh.htm

    or

    or SS 1/8
    http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-S...16%20ss410.htm

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by m4brian View Post
    It would be nice to see this Smith with a lightweight barrel profile. It would be very lightweight.

    Who else is using this barrel treatment now, moving away from chrome?
    Sig uses a nitride treated barrel on the 550 series including the 556, Bushmaster on the ACR, LWRC and AAC have also gone to nitride treatment for barrels. DS Arms uses a nitride treated barrel on its ZM4 carbine (flattop AR) and the SA58 CTC (FAL) rifle.
    Last edited by Fabius; 07-15-11 at 23:23.

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,620
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fabius View Post
    Sig uses a nitride treated barrel on the 550 series including the 556, Bushmaster on the ACR, LWRC and AAC have also gone to nitride treatment for barrels. DS Arms uses a nitride treated barrel on its ZM4 carbine (flattop AR) and the SA58 CTC (FAL) rifle.
    CMMG's "WASP" treatment is also some form of nitrocarburizing.

    Just to summarize and add a few, the list of currently marketed ARs or uppers with some form of nitrocarburizing treatment seems to be:
    S&W M&P15 "Sport" model
    CMMG - LE Series with WASP treatment
    DS Arms (most ZM4 models and ZM4 uppers, but they also offer plain CM and chrome-lined on certain styles)
    LWRC
    POF-USA
    AAC
    Adams Arms (uppers)
    Huldra Arms (rifles and uppers with chrome-moly barrels {not stainless})
    Bushmaster ACR (no other models)
    Sig - 550-556
    Superior Barrels with "hard blue" (uppers and barrels) {http://www.superiorbarrels.com/}

    From the list above it seems that this treatment is used by inexpensive models on the one hand (S&W, CMMG, DSA) and boutique more expensive models on the other hand (all others), and as far as I know is not currently used on a mid to high end upper in an ordinary DI AR-15 configuration, with the sole exception of the uppers from Superior Barrels, on which I have no reputational information.

    Fabius, I couldn't find any information about an "SA58 CTC" on DSA's website or on google. I know that DSA had been offering nitride treated L1A1 barrels for a brief period of time, but apparently not right now. Do you have any more information on this model? Most of the SA58 models have a 4150 steel barrel that is cryo treated but not, to my knowledge, given any surface treatment like chrome or nitriding.

Page 22 of 50 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •