Page 9 of 50 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 493

Thread: S&W Melonite coated barrel vs Noveske chrome lined barrel.

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    4,596
    Feedback Score
    0
    A good gun is a good gun.

    A bad gun is a bad gun.

    A bad gun with a nitride barrel is still a bad gun, and the same is true for a bad gun with a chrome lined barrel.

    This debate would not be so heated if we weren't talking about lower level firearms.

    On the other hand, we know nitride works on a good design.

    Last edited by variablebinary; 07-04-11 at 03:02.
    Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
    What Happened to the American dream? It came true. You're looking at it.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,388
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by variablebinary View Post
    A good gun is a good gun.

    A bad gun is a bad gun.

    A bad gun with a nitride barrel is still a bad gun, and the same is true for a bad gun with a chrome lined barrel.

    This debate would not be so heated if we weren't talking about lower level firearms.

    On the other hand, we know nitride works on a good design.

    Yep. I agree. Wholeheartedly.
    "One cannot awaken a man who pretends to be asleep..."

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,388
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by urbankaos04 View Post
    So, just to clarify, as I don't quite get what you posted, you're saying that nitriding IS a viable barrel finish?
    Absolutely. I prefer it to hard chrome.
    "One cannot awaken a man who pretends to be asleep..."

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mjolnir View Post
    Absolutely. I prefer it to hard chrome.
    I haven't seen you post in a while.

    What are technical aspects that make you prefer it over a chrome lined barrel?

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,388
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Nitrocarburization

    Quote Originally Posted by EzGoingKev View Post
    I haven't seen you post in a while.

    What are technical aspects that make you prefer it over a chrome lined barrel?
    It's a conversion coating so there is theoretically no bore distortion. It's harder, it's better at resisting both wear and salt water corrosion and the hard and corrosion resistant layers are about twice as thick as hard chrome.

    It's being used in motorsports where ferrous alloys are being used in an abrasive environment. Some of these parts are highly polished and then coated with Tungsten Diamond Like Carbon ( W DLC ) or some other thin film coating like Titanium Nitride (bright gold).

    I follow metallurgical and material science developments that could relate to motorsports and firearms very, very closely (I'm an egg head) and I've not run across anything better than nitrocarburization and thin film vapor deposition coatings. I have a series of technical papers I can email anyone interested. Just PM me your email address.

    Having Ionbond coat your Glock or HK slides would be about as good as it gets.

    Mike Rock and I speak (via email) about fluidized bed nitrocarburization of barrels and he's a much better metallurgist/material science guy than I (and a barrel maker to boot) and he's one of the few renowned barrel makers with an engineering degree and I believe he has a honorary PhD from Univ of Wisconsin. He's a patriot and a half, too. Buy an LMT to show your gratitude! :wink:
    "One cannot awaken a man who pretends to be asleep..."

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mjolnir View Post
    It's a conversion coating so there is theoretically no bore distortion.
    If I understand things correctly they heat the parts up to 1300 or more degrees. I would think the barrel would to be supported properly or you maybe introducing the possibility of distortion.

    One would have to be measured/gauged prior to the process and then again after the process to determine if the methods being used are right for barrels.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    929
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mjolnir View Post
    It's a conversion coating so there is theoretically no bore distortion. It's harder, it's better at resisting both wear and salt water corrosion and the hard and corrosion resistant layers are about twice as thick as hard chrome.

    It's being used in motorsports where ferrous alloys are being used in an abrasive environment. Some of these parts are highly polished and then coated with Tungsten Diamond Like Carbon ( W DLC ) or some other thin film coating like Titanium Nitride (bright gold).

    I follow metallurgical and material science developments that could relate to motorsports and firearms very, very closely (I'm an egg head) and I've not run across anything better than nitrocarburization and thin film vapor deposition coatings. I have a series of technical papers I can email anyone interested. Just PM me your email address.

    Having Ionbond coat your Glock or HK slides would be about as good as it gets.

    Mike Rock and I speak (via email) about fluidized bed nitrocarburization of barrels and he's a much better metallurgist/material science guy than I (and a barrel maker to boot) and he's one of the few renowned barrel makers with an engineering degree and I believe he has a honorary PhD from Univ of Wisconsin. He's a patriot and a half, too. Buy an LMT to show your gratitude! :wink:
    Whenever you get a chance, could you email me that info? I too am a big fan of Nitride and find it very interesting. I'm always trying to learn more on the subject as well as find some hard data to put this issue to rest. Thanks

    lincolnls3364@hotmail.com

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    ACR, RGP, and AAC 300 AAC Blackout barrels are all nitrided because Remingon did extensive testing and the barrels did last 60% longer than chrome lined.

    Chrome is legacy but not as good as nitriding.

    There are also plenty of ways to mess up Melonite so I would be weary of it in many cases as the specific process is critical and almost certainly many are not doing it correctly.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    929
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    ACR, RGP, and AAC 300 AAC Blackout barrels are all nitrided because Remingon did extensive testing and the barrels did last 60% longer than chrome lined.

    Chrome is legacy but not as good as nitriding.

    There are also plenty of ways to mess up Melonite so I would be weary of it in many cases as the specific process is critical and almost certainly many are not doing it correctly.
    Interesting. I had no idea the ACR was nitrided.

    Is plasma nitriding the process that the "better" companies use? or does it not make any diff.?

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    I don't know of guns being done by plasma nitriding, but the Sig 550 series rifles have been gas nitrided forever - and they are of course one of the bestiest assault rifles ever made.
    Last edited by rsilvers; 07-04-11 at 22:41.

Page 9 of 50 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •