View Poll Results: Would you put a vltor a5 buffer system on your SHTF/go to fighting rifle?

Voters
259. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    219 84.56%
  • No

    40 15.44%
Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 95

Thread: vltor a5 buffer system on your shtf/fighting rifle?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mkmckinley View Post
    However the main reason I like it is the reduced or eliminated carrier bounce and reduced rate of fire provided by the A5.
    Are you shooting full auto?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Barrington, IL
    Posts
    111
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have A5 systems on my KAC SR-15 and 14.5" mid-length with a DD barrel. Both choke with Brown Bear when dirty, even with the lightest buffer, so off they come. For those rifles it was a solution to a problem that I didn't have and yielded no measurable benefit, for me.

    Now, I will leave it on the lower I use on my S&W 5.45 upper, that gun is way overgassed with Russian Mil-surp ammo and it was a slight improvement over a carine system with an H3.

    Having siad that, I don't have a SHTF only rifle so I can't dedicate only toM855. I won't spend the money to shoot 5.56 loads all the time. But for that role I think it shows minor improvement, versus a carbine buffer system. These are my findings having an A5 on 3 different lowers and IMHO, YMMV, yada, yada, yada.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    154
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I'm kind of unsure as to what the A5 actually is.

    This is what I understand:
    Rifle spring
    Rifle weight and size buffer (without the section forward of the front of the spring)
    Longer buffer tube (that collapsed is the same length as a carbine tube?)

    All this is basically a tuned system for a longer (smoother) stroke during cycling which allows a longer gas system and a shorter/over-gassed system to work similarly.

    Do I have this correct? I'm interested in this system, but I'd like to make sure I understand what it is.

    Would this work on a 7.62 AR to reduce some of the felt recoil?
    Last edited by TCBA_Joe; 09-10-11 at 16:52.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    A5 system buffers as a cross between carbine and rifle buffers.


    For me it has smoothed out the recoil. On my SR15 it was about as effective as adding the Triple Tap, and so far (couple k rounds) no loss of reliability.


    AR10/SR25 buffer systems are already A5 length. Basically they took a SR25 length tube, and made a buffer to fit it for AR15 use. The Vltor A5 and AR10 extensions are the same size just a difference in the number of stock positions.

    A carbine length stock will not collapse all the way. Something like an ACS will collapse to within a half inch of the castle nut.




    Aside from that tech talk, as I said, on my SR15 the benefit was about equal to what the Triple Tap did for recoil and muzzle rise. With both of them on the gun off a bench the T1 red dot barely moves on a LaRue target at 250 yards. If I placed the dot upper COM on that target, and fired a round the dot would move up to about head height. To me that is pretty impressive at that distance.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,352
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    II tried it on my 11.5" and didn't like it....sold it a week later. I installed the RE/buffer/spring and ran some speed and accuracy drills and noticed slightly more red dot movement compared to my previous set up with Battlecomp, H buffer and Carbine spring. Not sure why it didn't work for me, but it didn't so I stuck with worked better for me.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Posts
    24,900
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    Correct me if I am wrong. I thought the SR-15 was supposed to be run with milspec ammo and not Russian fodder?

    Quote Originally Posted by handyandy View Post
    I have A5 systems on my KAC SR-15 and 14.5" mid-length with a DD barrel. Both choke with Brown Bear when dirty, even with the lightest buffer, so off they come. For those rifles it was a solution to a problem that I didn't have and yielded no measurable benefit, for me.

    Now, I will leave it on the lower I use on my S&W 5.45 upper, that gun is way overgassed with Russian Mil-surp ammo and it was a slight improvement over a carine system with an H3.

    Having siad that, I don't have a SHTF only rifle so I can't dedicate only toM855. I won't spend the money to shoot 5.56 loads all the time. But for that role I think it shows minor improvement, versus a carbine buffer system. These are my findings having an A5 on 3 different lowers and IMHO, YMMV, yada, yada, yada.



    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    For the shorter carbine receiver extension to work without the BCG bottoming out during it's cycle, the carbine buffer must also be shortened. The buffer was shortened by removing the extra length aft of spring stop as well as to the fore to make everything as short as possible, necessitating a shorter spring. Shorter springs are less forgiving than longer springs.

    The A5 extension is a length between the rifle and carbine. VLTOR simply removed the extra length of the buffer aft of the spring stop. The length ahead of the spring stop is the same as the rifle buffer. This allows the use of the longer rifle spring inside a shorter extension.

    Here is a photo from the VLTOR webiste showing the difference between a standard rifle buffuer with spring (top) and the A5 bufferwith spring (bottom). You can clearly see where the extra length was removed. The solution is brilliant in it's simplicity


    This photo shows the difference between the A5 buffer and the carbine buffer

    An A5 extension compared to the carbine extension


    Link to VLTOR A5 kit- http://vltor.com/emod-a5.html
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KCMH
    Posts
    2,986
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MistWolf View Post
    For the shorter carbine receiver extension to work without the BCG bottoming out during it's cycle, the carbine buffer must also be shortened. The buffer was shortened by removing the extra length aft of spring stop as well as to the fore to make everything as short as possible, necessitating a shorter spring. Shorter springs are less forgiving than longer springs.

    The A5 extension is a length between the rifle and carbine. VLTOR simply removed the extra length of the buffer aft of the spring stop. The length ahead of the spring stop is the same as the rifle buffer. This allows the use of the longer rifle spring inside a shorter extension.

    Here is a photo from the VLTOR webiste showing the difference between a standard rifle buffuer with spring (top) and the A5 bufferwith spring (bottom). You can clearly see where the extra length was removed. The solution is brilliant in it's simplicity


    This photo shows the difference between the A5 buffer and the carbine buffer

    An A5 extension compared to the carbine extension


    Link to VLTOR A5 kit- http://vltor.com/emod-a5.html
    That cleared it up very well, Thank you for that.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    23
    Feedback Score
    0

    YES

    BCM 16" hammerforged middy, BattleComp, and A5. I have experimented with the different A5 buffer weights, and have ran a 600 rnd count carbine course, and 300 or so rounds with the heavy buffer with zero malfunctions. Now have approx 1800 total through rifle with zero malfunctions. This is my SHTF rifle. I do have a complete spare (along with spare BCM bcg, ect.), that will more than likely become another rifle.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by PortDawg View Post
    BCM 16" hammerforged middy, BattleComp, and A5. I have experimented with the different A5 buffer weights, and have ran a 600 rnd count carbine course, and 300 or so rounds with the heavy buffer with zero malfunctions. Now have approx 1800 total through rifle with zero malfunctions. This is my SHTF rifle. I do have a complete spare (along with spare BCM bcg, ect.), that will more than likely become another rifle.




    Probaly one of the best investments. Complete spare BCG and LPK with tools and knowledge how to do swaps.

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •