Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 115

Thread: PSA PATROL CARBINE MINI-REVIEW

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Tex-Mex Border (USA side)
    Posts
    220
    Feedback Score
    0

    PSA PATROL CARBINE MINI-REVIEW

    My $999 Palmetto State Armory Patrol Carbine package (including Aimpoint PRO and Magpul BUS) arrived a few days ago. Here is my initial mini-review.

    The rifle was packaged well with the Magpul BUS installed. The Aimpoint PRO was in its own box and the magazine was wrapped well so as not to damage anything in transit.

    Exterior fit and finish were very good, with no blemishes. There are PSA logos on the upper, lower, stock, bolt, buffer and magazine floorplate. The integral picatinny type mount on the upper receiver is T-numbered.

    The bolt assembly was heavily oiled as was the trigger assembly. The bolt is unmarked except for the "MP" test mark, and the trigger pull is typical M4 weight. The carrier key is properly staked.

    The only negative was that the bolt was binding slightly when moved back and forth inside the bolt carrier by hand. I assumed that this minor roughness would resolve itself and smooth out after firing a few rounds, which it did.

    At the range I fired a total of 150 rounds of Wolf 62gr and PMC X-TAC 62gr ammo from P-Mags, the PSA mag that was included in the package, and several military surplus mags. There were no malfunctions of any kind.

    Firing was done at 25y. The Magpul BUS was already sighted in from the factory, but the PRO was off by about 12”. Once the PRO was sighted in firing was done from prone, sitting, and standing. All firing was rapid fire = about 1 shot per second. The rifle was smoking near the end from the barrel heat but the handguards were still cool.

    The Aimpoint PRO and the BUS are co-witness useable. The Magpul can be instantly deployed with the push of a button in the unlikely event the PRO fails.

    The last 20 rounds were fired from the bench rapid fire resulting in a ragged one-hole group.

    This rifle appears to be of very good quality, is 100% reliable, looks good and comes with about $450+ worth of appropriate high quality extras that a street-ready patrol carbine requires. I like it.
    Last edited by SIMBA-LEE; 10-23-11 at 11:19.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Feedback Score
    0
    Does it use a mil-spec diameter extension and was the endplate staked? Sounds like a good deal for guys getting started.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    781
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quick link to the specs:

    http://www.palmettostatearmory.com/2557.php

    .
    -David

    AR-15 owner/shooter since 1998

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    265
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    were teh feedramps misaligned?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Great review! Can you add some pics of your gun showing:

    1) Both sides
    2) Feedramps
    3) Bolt Carrier disassembled

    Thanks!


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Flyover country
    Posts
    1,324
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Javelin View Post
    Great review! Can you add some pics of your gun showing:

    1) Both sides
    2) Feedramps
    3) Bolt Carrier disassembled

    Thanks!

    Not hijacking here, but if interested here are pics of my PSA midlength FN upper. These are the views you asked the OP for:








    I have about 1k rnds through it so far with only positives to report.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Tex-Mex Border (USA side)
    Posts
    220
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for posting the pics Pork Chop, since I don't know how to do it. Thanks also for specs AMMOTECH, I didn't include them since I knew they were already on this site, but should have referenced them.

    I'll be going back to the range in a few days for some 100y shooting with target ammo to see what the accuracy potential is, and will report back.

    If someone who knows how to post photos would PM me the directions I'd appreciate it.
    Last edited by SIMBA-LEE; 10-23-11 at 11:22.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    4,130
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Thanks for the write up. I have to admit this rifle is attractive in price.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Tex-Mex Border (USA side)
    Posts
    220
    Feedback Score
    0
    Pork Chop sent me a PM on how to post photos. I'll try it the next time it is necessary.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pork Chop View Post
    Not hijacking here, but if interested here are pics of my PSA midlength FN upper. These are the views you asked the OP for:








    I have about 1k rnds through it so far with only positives to report.
    That looks like a solid built gun. I wonder what the Colt die-hards are going to say when they finally chime in?

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •