They are ready to shoot as is. Shoot a box of ammo and see how it works . They are easy to take apart and inspect for wear. IMO J frames aren't IMO the guns you shoot 1000s of rounds through and I have an assortment of 5 frames and I enjoy them. A 158 gn through a steel J frame is not bad but through an Airweight is in my opinion can be a big owie. I like the non +p for fun shooting an the =p for defensive shooting.
This year I had my 1st J frame that had to go back to S&W. 640 Pro with tritium front and rear sights. I've shot J frames since the 1970s.
At round count 77 you could not pull the trigger because the cylinder front was binding against the rear of the barrel.
After it came back from S&W I fired 400+ rounds through it without cleaning with no issues. It has worked fine since.
With an airweight J-frame, reliability of the revolver itself is only part of the equation. Your ammo must also be reliable in that platform.
The issue is that, under recoil, the bullets of the unfired rounds in the cylinder can "jump the crimp" and allow the bullets to migrate forward out of the cartridge case. If a bullet manages to protrude from the face of the cylinder, it can tie up the gun.
Thus, check your ammo choice by firing several "cylinderfull minus one" strings, keeping the same unfired round in the cylinder. Afterward, check it to see if the bullet is migrating forward. If it isn't, you should be good to go.
Rosco
couple hundred rounds of live fire should be good.
which reminds me, i haven't shot mine since i got it back form smith with a new frame...
Bookmarks