MidWest Industries
Noveske Rifleworks

Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > General Firearms > Terminal Ballistic Information

Terminal Ballistic Information Technical Discussions featuring DocGKR

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Unread 02-16-12, 19:45
200RNL Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 223
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
Traditional Foster slugs are very poor penetrators on hard objects, and game-animals alike. I have actually had one fail to penetrate more than 2 milk-jugs in a row filled with water.

Fosters may not be good against half inch steel plate but they are good at penetrating car bodies. Also, there must be a reason why they are considered good insurance while in bear country. Good penetration of tissue and bone is needed when facing an angry bear.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Unread 02-16-12, 20:35
WS6 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,674
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 200RNL View Post
Fosters may not be good against half inch steel plate but they are good at penetrating car bodies. Also, there must be a reason why they are considered good insurance while in bear country. Good penetration of tissue and bone is needed when facing an angry bear.
Traditional Fosters are NOT good insurance in bear country. They are very soft and fragment/expand too violently. Very poor penetration on thick muscle and bone. Or even water jugs, as I found out myself.

Last edited by WS6; 02-16-12 at 20:36
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Unread 02-16-12, 22:36
Skintop911's Avatar
Skintop911 Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 5,213
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
Traditional Fosters are NOT good insurance in bear country. They are very soft and fragment/expand too violently. Very poor penetration on thick muscle and bone. Or even water jugs, as I found out myself.
I'm trying to stay open minded, but I'm having trouble reconciling that with the number of white tail and mule deer I've shot with 1oz fosters, and a few autopsies of folks who caught them.

There's always something more optimal, but I don't think the traditional foster is necessarily a bad choice for most folks. I've come to like the FC LE tru-ball very much for LE and defensive use.
__________________
2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
Hi Point 9mm, Lorcin .22, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Norinco SKS, Leapers 10x
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Unread 02-16-12, 22:49
WS6 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,674
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skintop911 View Post
I'm trying to stay open minded, but I'm having trouble reconciling that with the number of white tail and mule deer I've shot with 1oz fosters, and a few autopsies of folks who caught them.

There's always something more optimal, but I don't think the traditional foster is necessarily a bad choice for most folks. I've come to like the FC LE tru-ball very much for LE and defensive use.
Foster slugs fragment at self-defense range. Just not optimal for penetration on a bear. Against people, I'm sure it's hell. Here is one example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HuVkXLreWE

If you think there are bear in the area, Ddupleks or Brenneke would be my choice. Probably Brenneke just because I am more familiar with them, although I had shot the Ddupleks and found them to perform as advertised. I have blown Fosters up on most everything I shot with them. Very poor penetration.
Another example:
http://www.brassfetcher.com/12gaugeFedTacSlug.html

Lots of deformation. Less penetration than a good 9mm JHP.

Last edited by WS6; 02-16-12 at 22:56
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Unread 02-16-12, 22:51
Skintop911's Avatar
Skintop911 Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 5,213
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
Foster slugs fragment at self-defense range. Just not optimal for penetration on a bear. Against people, I'm sure it's hell.
Yeah, I should've clarified. If I was intentionally or incidentally enountering bears, I'd want some purpose-built. I just didn't get the criticism of the fosters in general.
__________________
2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
Hi Point 9mm, Lorcin .22, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Norinco SKS, Leapers 10x
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Unread 02-16-12, 22:59
WS6 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,674
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skintop911 View Post
Yeah, I should've clarified. If I was intentionally or incidentally enountering bears, I'd want some purpose-built. I just didn't get the criticism of the fosters in general.
http://le.atk.com/pdf/Shotshell_Data_Book.pdf

Please look at page 4 (slide 3). It says in pictures what I have been trying to say in words.

Foster slugs are crap for penetration. Your FC Tru-Ball gives a whopping 10" of penetration against bare gel, or heavy clothing.

Last edited by WS6; 02-16-12 at 23:03
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Unread 02-17-12, 01:24
tpd223 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 1,562
iTrader: (3)
That is one brand of slug on one set of tests.

Having seen people and deer blown up really, really badly with Foster style slugs I have no issue with them.

I'd pick a different slug for bears though.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Unread 02-17-12, 01:37
WS6 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,674
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpd223 View Post
That is one brand of slug on one set of tests.

Having seen people and deer blown up really, really badly with Foster style slugs I have no issue with them.

I'd pick a different slug for bears though.
I have seen the same thing from Remington and Winchester. A foster slug is very thin, like a shuttle-cock. They "doughnut" when they impact at high enough velocity. Sure, I agree they would work fine on thin-skinned game, and especially on a deer at 50+ yards or so. However, we agree with my original point--penetration is NOT their strong-point.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Unread 02-17-12, 12:13
200RNL Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 223
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
I have seen the same thing from Remington and Winchester. A foster slug is very thin, like a shuttle-cock.
I have recovered pristine Foster slugs that were fired into snow. They don't look anything like the unfired slug. At the moment of firing they slug up to the diameter of the bore and lose half their length. The rifling on the sides of the slug is compressed and almost unrecognizable.

When recovered, they look like a very short, blunt, round nose lead bullet with a shallow concave base. It's a really amazing transformation in appearence and shows the large amount of stress these projectiles experience when fired.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Unread 02-17-12, 13:04
tpd223 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 1,562
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
I have seen the same thing from Remington and Winchester. A foster slug is very thin, like a shuttle-cock. They "doughnut" when they impact at high enough velocity. Sure, I agree they would work fine on thin-skinned game, and especially on a deer at 50+ yards or so. However, we agree with my original point--penetration is NOT their strong-point.
I agree that penetration in heavy animals is not a strong point for standard Foster slugs, but I believe it is one reason why they work so well on people.
They expand hugely (yes, that is a word!) and often fragment, and seem to cause a massive temp cavity, well into the area of where it adds to the tissue damage.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Unread 02-17-12, 19:16
200RNL Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 223
iTrader: (0)



Last edited by 200RNL; 02-17-12 at 19:19
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Unread 02-18-12, 02:02
DocGKR Offline
Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 3,288
iTrader: (0)
I am NOT a fan of typical Foster type slugs. When I use a slug, it is generally with the goal of penetrating something--often times intermediate barriers or large dangerous animals. For that role, both 1 oz Brenneke slugs and the new Federal (PB127 DPRS) Truball Deep Penetrator 1 oz slug work far better than Foster type slugs.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Unread 02-18-12, 10:54
200RNL Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 223
iTrader: (0)
Are there any wound profile images like the one above, for Brenneke slugs? It would be an interesting comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Unread 02-18-12, 14:22
DocGKR Offline
Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 3,288
iTrader: (0)
Looks basically exactly the same, except the Brenneke's can go slightly deeper with just a bit larger TC depending on which specific load is under consideration...


Brenneke Tactical Home Defense


Brenneke Classic Magnum
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Unread 02-19-12, 02:47
DocGKR Offline
Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 3,288
iTrader: (0)
http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=99583
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Unread 02-19-12, 06:46
tpd223 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 1,562
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
Thanks for the info, very useful to have for LE folks who have to shop for agency ammo.


That new Federal high penetration slug looks like it would be a very good choice for use in bear country.

Last edited by tpd223; 02-19-12 at 06:47
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Unread 04-27-12, 06:01
WS6 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,674
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
I am NOT a fan of typical Foster type slugs. When I use a slug, it is generally with the goal of penetrating something--often times intermediate barriers or large dangerous animals. For that role, both 1 oz Brenneke slugs and the new Federal (PB127 DPRS) Truball Deep Penetrator 1 oz slug work far better than Foster type slugs.
I thought the DPRS was a Foster style slug, just made from tougher alloy than typical. Does it differ in other ways, as well?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Unread 04-30-12, 00:12
hamour Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 22
iTrader: (0)
You boy's is missing the boat. The Dixie Slugs TriBall loading will handle your shot gun problems with ease.

3 x .60 round-balls of hard cast lead will handle most critters.

http://www.dixieslugs.com/home.html

Only draw back is it takes a 3" or 3.5" gun to shoot them.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Unread 04-30-12, 16:54
bzdog's Avatar
bzdog Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: seattle(ish)
Posts: 171
iTrader: (0)
Don't forget the Dixie DGS hardened slug.

Personally I think the FC #1 buck as primary with a couple DGS' on the side-saddle make a optimal pairing.

-john

Last edited by bzdog; 04-30-12 at 16:57
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Unread 04-30-12, 17:53
hamour Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 22
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bzdog View Post
Don't forget the Dixie DGS hardened slug.

Personally I think the FC #1 buck as primary with a couple DGS' on the side-saddle make a optimal pairing.

-john
I agree bzdog. Any 3" # 1 Buckshot load solves most problems. 24 .30 caliber pellets is tough on most animals or social problems.

I have killed some big hogs with # 1 buck and while some did not get through the boars shield, the rest tore up his vitals and broke his legs, letting me finish him off with ease.

But some of the guys was talking about big bears and the Dixie products are made just for that situation. So I brought them up, thanks for reminding me of their big slugs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.