Why reinvent the wheel with that 240B? It's a solution looking for a problem. The regular buttstock balances and obviously carries better. What's up with that trigger group? I'll admit, the shorter barrel and flash hider certainly is nice.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member
Why reinvent the wheel with that 240B? It's a solution looking for a problem. The regular buttstock balances and obviously carries better. What's up with that trigger group? I'll admit, the shorter barrel and flash hider certainly is nice.
Senior Member
That's the same stock on all of the 240s and 249s now.Originally Posted by Flatlander35
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sic semper tyrannis.
Member
Seriously? I was thrilled to trade in my heavy M4-patterned 249 stock for the older side twist two armed stock. Lighter and worked just fine for everybody else using it too. I've never seen a 240B stock that wasn't fixed. Anybody here have experience with them?
Senior Member
Yep. Both of my gun teams had them on their 240Ls and they work fine. Guys liked the adjustable LOP and we didn't break any of them.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks