Just to be clear I'm not bashing the gun by any means, I'll most likely end up with one some day. Just stating the fact it's a new design and I'm curious about it, it's not an AR15 or AR10. I understand they too are made of aluminum; however, comparing the 2 is an apples to oranges comparison. I personally think it will hold up just fine, I'd just like to see it after it's been abused and shot several thousand times. I have no doubt that Kevin and his team would put out anything less than safe and durable. Just curious to see how it stands up. That is all.
Ben
I'd like to know how it measures up against the Ruger Precision Rifle. Looks like both offerings willing be competing in the same market segment.
Doc Williams
U.S. Army Combat Medic/Flight Medic Retired
1987 - 2013
Flight Medic Class 4-95
http://www.dustoff.org/
For a 6.5 Creedmoor range gun I'm interested in the Tikka T3x Tac A1. For a lightweight, suppressor ready Elk gun in .300 WSM the Fix has my attention.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Does anyone have any pics of groups at 300 or longer with it? He discusses many of the features in it, just like his other vids. But there is nothing stated on how accurate it is compared to a shoulder barreled action....or how they accomplished their accuracy to achieve ~99% of a bolt gun.
Other than the barrel being too short for any real speed, its not too bad.
Thanks for clearing that up. I guess I thought that since all serious AR-15s have forged aluminum receivers that "the fix's" receiver would also be forged. Investment casting is not as strong as forging, but a very good way to make complex and precise parts. For those interested:
Making it out of aluminum means it’s light, and if every aluminum-bodied, semi-auto .308 AR out there has so far managed not to blow the face off its user without Remington’s magic three-rings-of-steel force field, we’re OK with The Fix’s investment cast-aluminum body.
Q is using an advanced, cooled investment casting technology that gives them extremely precise control of the material’s shape, doing things for pennies that would cost dollars to do any other way.
“With the casting, what we end up with is the ability to make very complex shapes very inexpensively,” says Lessard. “That’s one of the reasons why this is going to be a $2,500 gun, not a $6,000 gun.”
Read more: http://www.recoilweb.com/we-knew-q-l...#ixzz4Wdupl2fe
Last edited by Cold/Bore; 01-23-17 at 20:53.
Bookmarks