Mobocracy is alive and well in America.*
*Supporting Evidence for Hypothesis: The Internet
-me
'All of my firearms have 4 military features, a barrel, a trigger, a hammer, and a stock."
-coworker
Everything I have read from the detractors up to this point really comes down to my original statement:
I think from my personal experience people get a little more attached to their guns (and vehicles) more so then other kinds of kit. It is like an extension of them, and their ego. This has always been odd to me, as I have nothing to prove to anyone but myself, but the male ego is ****ing amazing when it comes to feeling special
Mobocracy is alive and well in America.*
*Supporting Evidence for Hypothesis: The Internet
-me
'All of my firearms have 4 military features, a barrel, a trigger, a hammer, and a stock."
-coworker
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
The will to win is worthless if you do not have the will to prepare. -Thane Yost
Whining in a forum that people have seen your thread, but not replied, reeks of an odd brand of desperation. - Me
Titling your thread "To XYZ or Not to XYZ" will cause me to completely ignore your thread.
Sorry about that I meant to link to the 12 moa upper.
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=61361
Thanks for providing the anticipated anecdotal response.
Rob_S I believe the posters that follow you comprehended my post, perhaps your view was obscured by your visor.
I was recently doing some reading on the topic of understanding chaos theory and variation in the manufacturing process. This vindicated my early impression that the “Chart” is crapp.
Now here is the point, the best parts do not necessarily yield the best product.
There are countless variables in manufacturing that affect the end result. The only way to know the quality of a part or complete weapon is to know the failure rate and causes of the failure at different time intervals.
While the chart has dribbles about pressure testing, individual testing and batch testing that might lead some to believe there is science afoot, the absence of failure rates renders it meaningless.
If you, or anyone else, could provide the failure rate for each AR by manufacturer at various intervals during its life cycle based on round count and time that would be useful.
Simply put Rob, your chart fails to meaningfully address quality.
The post above the pic of the bcg claimed no BM owners show bcg pics. So I followed right up with mine which was staked correctly. Not that hard to understand.
If you missed it here it isIB4 generic 1 and a million reply.That is the purpose of collecting data, and that is the purpose of this thread. I have yet to see any Oly, or BM, or DPMS owners post photos of their properly staked carrier key
I don't think you read that book very close. Do you honestly believe that you can take inferior metals input into the same manufacturing process and come out with a better gun at the end a meaningful number of times because of multiple variable set theory? That's some fuzzy logic, alright.
I smell a person from a third tier manufacturer trying to justify corner cutting.
Bookmarks