Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > AR/M4 > AR Technical Discussion

AR Technical Discussion Dive into the details and specifications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2006, 11:29 PM
K.L. Davis's Avatar
K.L. Davis Offline
Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 12S VA 868 817 (NAD83)
Posts: 1,081
iTrader: (0)
Buffer Tube Basics

I know, the correct name is receiver extension tube... so now that we got one of most common mistakes out of the way, let's look at some common questions about receiver extension tubes. I do not pretend to know everything about these rifles, so if you see anything that is wrong, let me know.

This info is for carbine/short/collapsable tubes - all rifle/long/standard tubes are the same (as far as dimensions go)

What is a Mil-Spec Tube? This has to be the most common question. A milspec tube is just as the name implies, made to the specifications of the technical data package (tdp). The biggest concern is the diameter of the tube, the milspec part has a diameter of ~1.147, the thread diameter is 1.1875

So the threads are bigger, are they rolled in? originally the threads were cut in with a regular old lathe. The narrower body section of the tube is reduced by cutting with a concave shaped cutter that "shaves" the metal down, sort of like a plane; occasionally you can see the result of this technique by two "lines" that run the length of the reduced section at ten and two o'clock. Current techniques do include rolling the threads in.

So what are tubes that are not Mil-Spec? During the original cloning of the military AR, the first commercial receiver extension tubes were made from an extrusion, the threads lathe cut and the body was not reduced. The common size for this is 1.170 and that has became the de facto standard for after market tubes.

So commercial tubes are bigger, are they stronger? No, the problem with them is that the threaded section is also 1.170, so the threads are not cut to full "height" and do not fully engage the threads in the receiver. The few commercial tubes that I have seen fail, pulled the threads out of the receiver.

Are there any other concerns with after market tubes? Well, there is really no set standard for size, so they can vary by manufacturer and even from lot to lot -- you can get combinations of after market parts that are tight or loose. Some of them are made with extrusions with an end plug welded in, the quality of the welding can run from pretty solid to pretty poor.

Are those the only two sizes? No, some manufacturers have come out with systems that do not use either the milspec or the aftermarket tube size... The early Choate stock is one example of a proprietory tube.

So what fits what? Milspec tubes work with stocks from Colt, Vltor, CMT, LMT/Crane, etc.

After market tubes work with RRA, BM, DPMS, etc.

A larger, after market stock will fit on a milspec tube, but will be loose and rattle -- a milsec stock will usually not fit on an after market tube... without a hammer.

Hey! My new Mil-Spec tube is too long? Some newer tubes made for the "enhanced" M4 stock are a little longer and have a small taper to the back to match the profile of the stock butt. It should not effect the use of a Mil-Spec stock however.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2006, 07:59 PM
9301's Avatar
9301 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 37
iTrader: (0)
Buffer Tube

And that is why when I tried putting a LMT stock on my RRA tube a couple years ago I ended up changing the tube because I didn’t have the heart to use the hammer you mentioned. Thanks, that explained a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2006, 01:35 AM
Dave L.'s Avatar
Dave L. Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,126
iTrader: (0)
so all the threads are the same size? can any buffer tube locking nut fit any buffer tube? Must a buffer tube be staked to stay in place(will those new Ace thin lock rings work)?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:16 AM
FlyAndFight's Avatar
FlyAndFight Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minas Miami
Posts: 462
iTrader: (0)
Stickman, any chance you could reload those pics? I'm getting the dreaded "red x's". Thanks.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." –Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2007, 05:29 AM
rob_s's Avatar
rob_s Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 9,325
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyAndFight
Stickman, any chance you could reload those pics? I'm getting the dreaded "red x's". Thanks.
Yep, me too.
__________________
WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2007, 10:50 AM
Chris_C's Avatar
Chris_C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 151
iTrader: (0)
Some newer tubes made for the "enhanced" M4 stock are a little longer and have a small taper to the back to match the profile of the stock butt. It should not effect the use of a Mil-Spec stock however.

Should I be confused?

I called Magpul a week or so ago and the rep I was on the phone with was describing to me how to ID my tube if it were mil spec or not, this was in an effort to see if my tubes would work with a CTR.

The tubes I have do NOT extend past the buttstock but they are slightly canted to follow the form of the buttstock.

I was told the canted tube means it is NOT milspec.

If I read this thread right, either I heard wrong or the Magpul guy is wrong.

I am willing to bet a kick between the legs that I heard wrong.
__________________
“For those who have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know.”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2007, 01:26 PM
Batt 57's Avatar
Batt 57 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 171
iTrader: (0)
Is it possible to buy mil-spec tubes?
__________________
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear.
Ambrose Redmoon
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2007, 01:31 PM
gotm4's Avatar
gotm4 Online
STAFF
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 9,502
iTrader: (6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batt 57
Is it possible to buy mil-spec tubes?
Yes, they're available from VLTOR, LMT, CMT.
__________________
armorer for VA Arms Co FFL/SOT
certified HK-Sidearms/S&W-M&P/Xe-USTC AR15-M16/Advanced GLOCK/SIG-Sauer LE/FNH-SCAR armorer
founder of Jensen-Ready Tactical
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2007, 02:45 PM
K.L. Davis's Avatar
K.L. Davis Offline
Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 12S VA 868 817 (NAD83)
Posts: 1,081
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_C
Some newer tubes made for the "enhanced" M4 stock are a little longer and have a small taper to the back to match the profile of the stock butt. It should not effect the use of a Mil-Spec stock however.

Should I be confused?

I called Magpul a week or so ago and the rep I was on the phone with was describing to me how to ID my tube if it were mil spec or not, this was in an effort to see if my tubes would work with a CTR.

The tubes I have do NOT extend past the buttstock but they are slightly canted to follow the form of the buttstock.

I was told the canted tube means it is NOT milspec.

If I read this thread right, either I heard wrong or the Magpul guy is wrong.

I am willing to bet a kick between the legs that I heard wrong.
I am sure it must be me that is wrong...

Manufacturers can make whatever they want, but the easy way to tell (other than actually measuring) is to look at the area where the key for the locking holes transitions into the buffer body... a milspec tube will have a sharp, very small radiused corner that looks almost square -- while the aftermarket tubes have a much larger radius, making a fillet at the corner.
__________________
The sun will rise tomorrow; it’s your attendance of the event that is uncertain.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-15-2007, 05:01 PM
Stickman's Avatar
Stickman Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyAndFight
Stickman, any chance you could reload those pics? I'm getting the dreaded "red x's". Thanks.
Sorry about that, they are back up now.
__________________
Stick


I have been asked to point out that I am Magpul's photographer. I have also done work for 45 or so manufacturers within the firearm community, my work has been used for web, catalog, banners, magazines, covers, etc. I have also shot work for the US Military where it has been used in training aids. I am prior service and a full time LEO.


I now also shoot and write for Military Times. My primary focus will stay with weapons, accessories and related equipment reviews. Manufacturers can reach me through any of the boards. If you have something new, let me know.



Newest pictures uploaded here at my Flickr account
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-15-2007, 05:15 PM
rob_s's Avatar
rob_s Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 9,325
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stickman
Sorry about that, they are back up now.
Thanks alot. Pretty much what I expected, but wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something.
__________________
WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:29 AM
Navy87Guy's Avatar
Navy87Guy Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stafford VA
Posts: 44
iTrader: (0)
What about CAA buttstocks - after market or MILSPEC?

Thanks.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-16-2007, 01:03 PM
gotm4's Avatar
gotm4 Online
STAFF
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 9,502
iTrader: (6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy87Guy
What about CAA buttstocks - after market or MILSPEC?

Thanks.

Jim
As far as I know their non-milspec and Jim you don't want one.
__________________
armorer for VA Arms Co FFL/SOT
certified HK-Sidearms/S&W-M&P/Xe-USTC AR15-M16/Advanced GLOCK/SIG-Sauer LE/FNH-SCAR armorer
founder of Jensen-Ready Tactical
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-17-2007, 11:10 PM
HAIL-CAESAR Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 101
iTrader: (0)
Hello gentlemen,
On the last post about not wanting a CAA stock????? Why not? Don't worry I don't have one. And this as you can see is my first post. But I want to thank everyone for all the info I have read over the hours and hours I've visited. THANK YOU.

AL
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:43 AM
gotm4's Avatar
gotm4 Online
STAFF
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 9,502
iTrader: (6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAIL-CAESAR
On the last post about not wanting a CAA stock????? Why not?
Because for roughly $15-20 more than the CAA you could have a CMT mil-spec stock. I highly recommend mil-spec receiver extension over commercial tubes if this is a rifle that you might depend on to defend yourself. I also recommend staking the castle nut after torquing properly, it may never come loose on it's own and the staking ensures that it won't, it's the same exact reason carrier key screws are staked. Proper torquing and using high quality parts and it may never come loose, staking ensures that it won't.

The mil-spec tubes have the full/completed threads and won't spin off with the castle nut, gouging the tube as RRA sometimes do, Bushys usually don't do it but they're not mil-spec either. I have found a technique to avoid this with the Loc-Tited on RRA receiver extensions.
__________________
armorer for VA Arms Co FFL/SOT
certified HK-Sidearms/S&W-M&P/Xe-USTC AR15-M16/Advanced GLOCK/SIG-Sauer LE/FNH-SCAR armorer
founder of Jensen-Ready Tactical
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:42 AM
5POINT56's Avatar
5POINT56 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 382
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by K.L. Davis View Post
Hey! My new Mil-Spec tube is too long? Some newer tubes made for the "enhanced" M4 stock are a little longer and have a small taper to the back to match the profile of the stock butt. It should not effect the use of a Mil-Spec stock however.
I can confirm that the tubes CMMG uses, combined with the Magpul CTR stock are not entirely compatable. They have this taper and longer length you mentioned.

My CMMG rifle will not allow the CTR to engage at the shortest position.

I brought this up to them (CMMG) after receiving my rifle and they simply told me that "Yes, the CTR will not lock up on the shortest position with our tubes." Frankly, I would have liked to have been told this prior to having my rifle built, because I would have been happy to ship CMMG the proper tube as to avoid this aggrivation from happening at all.

There are two solutions. One of which was addressed by Magpul themselves. Magpul sent me a butt pad/spacer for my CTR that is thicker than what is now currently available (the thicker pads should be available soon...I got one shipped early...thanks Magpul!) These pads/spacers have a deeper recess for the tube (maybe a half inch) than the current CTR pads.

Once installed, this thicker pad/spacer for the CTR just barely allowed the CMMG tube to lock up on the shortest position, but, trying to UNLOCK it from that position took an incredible amount of force on my part, making this an unacceptable solution.

The other solution is a 5 position mil spec tube available from DSA's web page. It's shorter and I have been told the CTR will function as it should with this tube. I haven't replaced my tube with this one yet, but I will.
__________________
AMERICAN INFIDEL
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-13-2007, 01:51 PM
John Hearne's Avatar
John Hearne Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern Mississippi
Posts: 248
iTrader: (0)
Can we get a list of which manufacturers sell their lowers with Mil-Spec buffer tubes?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-27-2007, 04:28 PM
invisible man Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12
iTrader: (0)
I just orderd the CTR/and milspec tube combo from Grant. Figgured get it done in one shot. I am just wondering if the hbuffer is good for bolth carbine and mid length rifles?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-02-2007, 05:49 PM
RD62's Avatar
RD62 Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,527
iTrader: (0)
Question

Hey guys,

First post here. I'm wanting to upgrade my RRA with a new CTR and if I'm gonna do that I might as well change the tube to a milspec. Am I correct in assuming the buffers are compatible between the two different sizes as I've never seen any buffers marked specifically for commercial or mil-spec? What about the back plate, nut etc? I have a couple of each laying around so I'd rather just pick up the tube and stock body if possible. Plus is there one mil-spec tube thats better than the others? Thanks for the info!

-RD62
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-31-2007, 04:46 PM
DrDrake's Avatar
DrDrake Offline
Manufacturer/Industry Professional
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
iTrader: (0)
Most tubes with the cant are comm. tubes. The exception are a few CMMG tubes that are mil spec dems. and have a canted end.

I owe you a kick in the nads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_C View Post
Some newer tubes made for the "enhanced" M4 stock are a little longer and have a small taper to the back to match the profile of the stock butt. It should not effect the use of a Mil-Spec stock however.

Should I be confused?

I called Magpul a week or so ago and the rep I was on the phone with was describing to me how to ID my tube if it were mil spec or not, this was in an effort to see if my tubes would work with a CTR.

The tubes I have do NOT extend past the buttstock but they are slightly canted to follow the form of the buttstock.

I was told the canted tube means it is NOT milspec.

If I read this thread right, either I heard wrong or the Magpul guy is wrong.

I am willing to bet a kick between the legs that I heard wrong.
__________________
Magpul bonehead
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.