Desert Tactical Arms

Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > AR/M4 > AR General Discussion

AR General Discussion General topics relating to the AR

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:24
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
Why doesn't it exist?

We all know the hassles we may encounter when perma pinning a muzzle device, but it makes me wonder why there isn't an option with a .750 diameter that would allow fsb/gas block removal.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:31
vicious_cb Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 681
iTrader: (13)
You would still need to have a smaller diameter muzzle device pinned in order to remove the gas block.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:31
IYAAYASwarrior's Avatar
IYAAYASwarrior Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Shreveport / Bossier, LA
Posts: 257
iTrader: (2)
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:34
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
thats what i said, the muzzle device would be the same diameter as the gas block

Last edited by Bauer C; 06-05-12 at 21:35
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:37
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IYAAYASwarrior View Post
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.
I dont need a professional to turn a wrench, weld or grind a weld.... i have access to basic tools
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:39
rushca01's Avatar
rushca01 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 794
iTrader: (11)
I have often wondered this myself.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 06-05-12, 21:40
Marty916's Avatar
Marty916 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Socialist Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 433
iTrader: (2)
Some devices cannot be made with a smaller OD due to limitations caused by that annoying physics thing or material limitations. For others it may be possible but typically components are the size and shape they are to satisfy form, fit, function. Changing one aspect can cause a cascade effect on other parts of the device or component with less than desirable results.
__________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 06-05-12, 22:20
SomeOtherGuy Online
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 795
iTrader: (3)
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.

To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 06-05-12, 22:35
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.

To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
I agree and I wouldn't buy another 14.5 if a 16 is available, but I recently received a used upper with a 14.5 and want to avoid the perm install drawbacks. I will have to look into that Nordic, looks like my only option for keeping it simple.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 06-06-12, 00:28
BlaineD's Avatar
BlaineD Online
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
iTrader: (0)
Huldra is selling this very feature.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 06-06-12, 09:06
Clem Offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 178
iTrader: (13)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.

To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
To answer your question regarding your first point, those of us living in AWB states like NJ have to have something pinned to our threads no matter what length it is.
So if my 16" needs to be pinned, why not go down to 14.5".

ETA: And I wish BC came out with something that had an OD of .750. I'd be all over it. I guess I'll just have to live with my BC1.0 and 1.5.

Last edited by Clem; 06-06-12 at 09:09
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 06-06-12, 09:20
polymorpheous's Avatar
polymorpheous Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,353
iTrader: (5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IYAAYASwarrior View Post
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.

Wow!


Thank you Marty for injecting some intelligence into this thread.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwe1 View Post
People should be allowed to fail. Only then will they start making the right decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 06-06-12, 09:47
Alex V's Avatar
Alex V Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Soviet Republic of NJ
Posts: 1,318
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clem View Post
To answer your question regarding your first point, those of us living in AWB states like NJ have to have something pinned to our threads no matter what length it is.
So if my 16" needs to be pinned, why not go down to 14.5".

ETA: And I wish BC came out with something that had an OD of .750. I'd be all over it. I guess I'll just have to live with my BC1.0 and 1.5.
+1...

Sucks not being able to even remove your GB... but then again, I don't know if I will ever feel the need to...

The only reason I can think for this is to replace a rail with something different and not being able to remove the barrel nut from the barrel.
__________________
..It was you to me who taught
In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 06-06-12, 14:09
MistWolf's Avatar
MistWolf Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,388
iTrader: (2)
A lightweight barrel could be made that was .75 at the gas port with a threadless step cut at the muzzle. A threadless muzzle device, such as the the Battlecomp could be made with the OD just small enough for the gas block to be removed. The threadless portions could be smaller in diameter since they do not have to be threaded and cut so they are an interference fit and pressed on, drilled, pinned and welded.

The other option is to design a clamp style gas block/FSB that can be split to be removed and also pinned in place. The FSB could be designed so it's pinned at the top. Drive the pins out, remove the screws holding the lower clamp and it's out of the way for replacing handguards or other maintenance
__________________
Quote:
Shape up and start acting like an American
-Harold B. Estes, WWII Navy Vet in a letter to President Obama, 2009
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
I am American
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 06-06-12, 14:30
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaineD View Post
Huldra is selling this very feature.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
I just sent them an email about this, i hope they will sell that flash hider separate!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Unread 06-06-12, 14:32
Bauer C's Avatar
Bauer C Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
iTrader: (1)
Heres a link to it

http://www.huldraarms.com/rifles/product_e83977a0cbcd/
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Unread 06-06-12, 15:25
BlaineD's Avatar
BlaineD Online
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
iTrader: (0)
Adams Arms sells their version of the Evo as well, but it has their own mb on it. It bet Huldra will sell one of their reduced radius ones since they must be installing them there.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Unread 06-06-12, 16:36
SomeOtherGuy Online
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 795
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauer C View Post
Very interesting - looks like an A2 on the slim-fast plan. I'm curious about effectiveness, but given that the M14 hider works decently with a similar ratio of hider diameter to bore diameter, hopefully it works OK.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Unread 06-06-12, 20:06
Muddyboots's Avatar
Muddyboots Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 53
iTrader: (0)
Mist wolf, I follow your thinking. If you make a recessed channel or similar feature that can mate with the collar of a muzzle device and be clamped on with a screw, the barrel would no longer have any evil threads so it wouldn't be an issue anymore. I think if the AWB didn't sunset, we would have seen a lot of things like that. As it is, the AWB states don't pull hard enough on the market to warrant the production work. If I'm wrong we need to get a lot louder as a group.

Muddyboots
__________________
Dirty AR Club

"Lube and GO!-If I wanted to clean out carbon I'd be a chimney sweep!"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Unread 06-06-12, 20:16
Casull's Avatar
Casull Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 600m three seconds ago. . .
Posts: 378
iTrader: (0)
imho as far as I understand so far an alternative method removable gas block would for sure act as a catalyst for modifications for those who buy a base AR to learn with first. Many people are new to guns and may not know what rail or hand guard they would care for. It would for sure introduce them to spending just as minimal on modifications as someone in Arizona.

If no one patents it I will eventually.
__________________
"Never present a hypothesis as a fact, that's not how it works..."

Last edited by Casull; 06-06-12 at 20:20
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.