
 |
|
 |
| AR General Discussion General topics relating to the AR |

06-05-12, 21:24
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
|
Why doesn't it exist?
We all know the hassles we may encounter when perma pinning a muzzle device, but it makes me wonder why there isn't an option with a .750 diameter that would allow fsb/gas block removal.
|

06-05-12, 21:31
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 681
|
|
|
You would still need to have a smaller diameter muzzle device pinned in order to remove the gas block.
|

06-05-12, 21:31
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Shreveport / Bossier, LA
Posts: 257
|
|
|
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.
|

06-05-12, 21:34
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
|
thats what i said, the muzzle device would be the same diameter as the gas block
Last edited by Bauer C; 06-05-12 at 21:35
|

06-05-12, 21:37
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IYAAYASwarrior
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.
|
I dont need a professional to turn a wrench, weld or grind a weld.... i have access to basic tools
|

06-05-12, 21:39
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 794
|
|
|
I have often wondered this myself.
|

06-05-12, 21:40
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Socialist Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 433
|
|
|
Some devices cannot be made with a smaller OD due to limitations caused by that annoying physics thing or material limitations. For others it may be possible but typically components are the size and shape they are to satisfy form, fit, function. Changing one aspect can cause a cascade effect on other parts of the device or component with less than desirable results.
__________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility"
|

06-05-12, 22:20
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 795
|
|
|
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.
To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
|

06-05-12, 22:35
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.
To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
|
I agree and I wouldn't buy another 14.5 if a 16 is available, but I recently received a used upper with a 14.5 and want to avoid the perm install drawbacks. I will have to look into that Nordic, looks like my only option for keeping it simple.
|

06-06-12, 00:28
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
|
|
|
Huldra is selling this very feature.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
|

06-06-12, 09:06
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 178
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy
The only useful device I know of that small is the Nordic Components "tactical compensator" which is 0.75" diameter. It's a pure brake, but it's small and it exists.
To my mind the better questions are:
1) After viewing the other thread on 14.5" with a pinned device vs. 16" with a removable device, who, without a legal SBR (individual or departmental), really feels that 1.5" benefits them enough to be worth the hassle?
2) If that market is out there, why doesn't some enterprising barrel maker provide a 16" barrel with an integrally machined device to avoid all this silly threading, installing, pinning, and welding?
|
To answer your question regarding your first point, those of us living in AWB states like NJ have to have something pinned to our threads no matter what length it is. 
So if my 16" needs to be pinned, why not go down to 14.5".
ETA: And I wish BC came out with something that had an OD of .750. I'd be all over it. I guess I'll just have to live with my BC1.0 and 1.5.
Last edited by Clem; 06-06-12 at 09:09
|

06-06-12, 09:20
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,353
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IYAAYASwarrior
Well one reason may be the fact that if it is easily remedied in Joe Schmoes garage, what is the need for professional Gun Smiths? Just my observation. Sometimes the small things like that drive the market for the above mentioned professionals.
|
Wow!
Thank you Marty for injecting some intelligence into this thread.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwe1
People should be allowed to fail. Only then will they start making the right decisions.
|
|

06-06-12, 09:47
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Soviet Republic of NJ
Posts: 1,318
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clem
To answer your question regarding your first point, those of us living in AWB states like NJ have to have something pinned to our threads no matter what length it is. 
So if my 16" needs to be pinned, why not go down to 14.5".
ETA: And I wish BC came out with something that had an OD of .750. I'd be all over it. I guess I'll just have to live with my BC1.0 and 1.5.
|
+1...
Sucks not being able to even remove your GB... but then again, I don't know if I will ever feel the need to...
The only reason I can think for this is to replace a rail with something different and not being able to remove the barrel nut from the barrel.
__________________
..It was you to me who taught
In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.
|

06-06-12, 14:09
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,388
|
|
|
A lightweight barrel could be made that was .75 at the gas port with a threadless step cut at the muzzle. A threadless muzzle device, such as the the Battlecomp could be made with the OD just small enough for the gas block to be removed. The threadless portions could be smaller in diameter since they do not have to be threaded and cut so they are an interference fit and pressed on, drilled, pinned and welded.
The other option is to design a clamp style gas block/FSB that can be split to be removed and also pinned in place. The FSB could be designed so it's pinned at the top. Drive the pins out, remove the screws holding the lower clamp and it's out of the way for replacing handguards or other maintenance
__________________
Quote:
Shape up and start acting like an American
-Harold B. Estes, WWII Navy Vet in a letter to President Obama, 2009
|
I am American
|

06-06-12, 14:30
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaineD
Huldra is selling this very feature.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
|
I just sent them an email about this, i hope they will sell that flash hider separate!
|

06-06-12, 14:32
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 101
|
|
|
|

06-06-12, 15:25
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
|
|
|
Adams Arms sells their version of the Evo as well, but it has their own mb on it. It bet Huldra will sell one of their reduced radius ones since they must be installing them there.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
|

06-06-12, 16:36
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 795
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauer C
|
Very interesting - looks like an A2 on the slim-fast plan. I'm curious about effectiveness, but given that the M14 hider works decently with a similar ratio of hider diameter to bore diameter, hopefully it works OK.
|

06-06-12, 20:06
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 53
|
|
|
Mist wolf, I follow your thinking. If you make a recessed channel or similar feature that can mate with the collar of a muzzle device and be clamped on with a screw, the barrel would no longer have any evil threads so it wouldn't be an issue anymore. I think if the AWB didn't sunset, we would have seen a lot of things like that. As it is, the AWB states don't pull hard enough on the market to warrant the production work. If I'm wrong we need to get a lot louder as a group.
Muddyboots
__________________
Dirty AR Club
"Lube and GO!-If I wanted to clean out carbon I'd be a chimney sweep!"
|

06-06-12, 20:16
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 600m three seconds ago. . .
Posts: 378
|
|
imho as far as I understand so far an alternative method removable gas block would for sure act as a catalyst for modifications for those who buy a base AR to learn with first. Many people are new to guns and may not know what rail or hand guard they would care for. It would for sure introduce them to spending just as minimal on modifications as someone in Arizona.
If no one patents it I will eventually.
__________________
"Never present a hypothesis as a fact, that's not how it works..."
Last edited by Casull; 06-06-12 at 20:20
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:48.
| |