Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 72

Thread: Evaluating Daniel Defense's 14.5" CHF LW 5.56 barrel...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,117
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)

    Evaluating Daniel Defense's 14.5" CHF LW 5.56 barrel...

    Hi guys, figured I would share a recent evaluation of mine that is a little bit different from my normal reports as I don't typically evaluate light weight barrels, or things from Daniel Defense. With so many great companies making solid AR kit these days, I haven't had the chance to try out Daniel Defense as much as I'd like to in the past. So with that said, I'm pretty confident I left what little bias I would have had out of this particular evaluation, and all data contained below is formatted in the most scientific approach that I could achieve. I bought this barrel from RainierArms several weeks ago.





    General Specs:

    Barrel Material: Chrome Moly Vanadium Steel
    Barrel Type: Cold Hammer Forged
    Barrel Caliber: 5.56 NATO
    Barrel Twist: 1:7
    Barrel Length: 14.5″
    Barrel Profile: Lightweight Profile
    Barrel Gas System: Mid-Length
    Gas Block: Pinned Low Profile
    Inside Finish: Chrome Lined
    Outside Finish: Military Specification Heavy Phosphate Coated
    Muzzle Thread: 1⁄2×28 TPI (Threads Per Inch)
    Gas Port Diameter: .625
    Barrel Extension: A4
    Weight: 1 lbs 6 oz
    Made in the USA!

    Accuracy Evaluation....




    Procedure: 10rd groups/100yds/prone w. bipod

    Three groups of Hornady 55gr. VMAX (30rds) is my long time "control" for evaluating barrels @ 100yds. Other ammo groups are being posted just for "snapshot" purposes.

    Barrel temps were never allowed to reach over 75 degrees F while shooting an individual group, and a 5 minute break was allowed between groups.

    Barrel temps are monitored via digital infrared thermometer...



    Conditions:

    Temp: 66 degrees F
    Humidity: 87%
    Pressure: 30.15 -->
    Elevation: 461ft.

    Rifle: DD 14.5" mid length CHF LW/Geissele 13" SMR MK1/Geissele SD-E trigger/NF NXSc 2.5-10x24 w. mil dot. Atlas bipod.

    Results:




    "Control groups" Hornady 55gr. Vmax:


    For reference/comparison: same procedure/ammo/etc as above except these were shot with an uber accurate Rock 18" 5R SS SPR barrel....we can clearly see how the lightweight profile starts out "lights out" accurate, but sure enough as stats grow...we see each additional group's POI change slightly, and open up. Just like blackjack in a casino, you can beat the house for an hour or two...but as time goes on, you can't defy the house's odds. The SPR barrel is obviously gonna be more accurate, but it's really important to note not so much the group size measurements, but rather how consistent each group's overall POI remains the same.


    "Snapshot groups" (L-R: Hornady 5.56 75gr. TAP T2....Federal M193....Hornady 55gr. Zmax):

    Last edited by ALCOAR; 06-08-18 at 01:50. Reason: fixing/updating pic links

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,117
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Velocity Evaluation:






    Setup: Oehler 35P proof screen chronograph set 10yds from muzzle

    **Barrel temps were never allowed to reach over 75 degrees F while shooting an individual velocity string, and a 5 min. break was allowed in between different strings.

    Conditions:

    Temp: 66 degrees F
    Humidity: 87%
    Pressure: 30.15 -->
    Elevation: 461ft.

    Velocity results:



    Ballistic charts for each individual ammo type were calculated using the above "true" velocity data, and then my actual conditions.

    M855 / 14.5" Ballistic chart




    MK318 / 14.5" Ballistic chart



    M193 / 14.5" Ballistic chart

    Last edited by ALCOAR; 08-23-12 at 14:45.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,117
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    FINAL REPORT:

    Grades....

    Accuracy: B+

    Handling: A+

    Consistency
    (resistance to accuracy
    degradation from
    barrel heat): C-

    Machining/finishing: A+

    chrome lining, rifling, GB fixture, feed ramps, muzzle threading, and exterior phosphate coating were all excellent on this particular barrel.

    In summery,

    If Daniel Defense makes every product in their line up as nicely as they do these barrels, then they will for sure cement a place in the AR industry for a really long time to come....right alongside Colt, LMT, KAC, etc.

    I'd strongly recommend this barrel for any Patrol/Duty/HD/PD type AR build where one isn't likely to encounter scenario's that will require either copious amounts of precision, or large volumes of successive firing.

    For what it is.....one helluva tiny barrel....I'm walking away very impressed

    *** As always, the velocity data wouldn't be possible without a fellow awesome member's generosity...Thanks Slomo for the usage of the 35P.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    615
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Thanks. Another very interesting post.
    former cat herder

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Those are better results than I expected. Pretty impressive!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    St Augustine, FL
    Posts
    221
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    I just recently used this barrel (with fsb) on my most recent build and I have been very happy with it's performance as well! This was my second barrel from them and I think I will continue to use their barrels in future builds. Thanks for the great post!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,892
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    The accuracy is what it is for a barrel in that catagory. Perfectly acceptable.

    That port size seems small for a 14.5 middy based on what the boys were saying in another thread... They were liking ports in the 7 range for that set up.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lansing, MI
    Posts
    258
    Feedback Score
    0
    Markm-
    Do you think he was measuring the barrel diameter at the gas block rather than the gas port itself?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    South Ga
    Posts
    27
    Feedback Score
    0
    Excellent write up, but I have to make note of one thing: The gas port diameter is not .625". That is the diameter of the barrel at the gas port. The gas port diameter is above 0.070" from the one I measured a long time ago.
    Guitars, cadillacs, and hillbilly music

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    529
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Thanks Trident, that is the exact barrel that I was looking at for my wifes rifle, looks like you just sealed the deal for her!!
    USMC MSGT Ret. 1371

    SEMPER PARATUS Certified AR-15 Armorer


    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." -Alexander Hamilton

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •