Originally Posted by
Magic_Salad0892
The Ruger has a strangely configured non-ff monolithic upper reciever, with a 1/9 twist, .223 chamber, using non mil-spec materials for the bolt, carrier, and barrel. The receiver extension is also commercial spec. Let's remember that their other rifles suck a lot (Mini-14/30), and they have absolutely no experience making an AR before the SR556.
The SIG 516, is designed by a company who has had a bad QC record as of late (though their legacy P series pistols seem to be intact in 9x19mm, .357 SIG and .40 S&W.) In a configuration nobody asked for, in a saturated market, at an undesirable price, that weighed a lot, and that company has no track record at all in regards to building an AR.
Now when you factor that into a market that has established names like KAC, Colt, Noveske, LMT, BCM, DD, HK, and Centurion Arms, you're not going to have a desirable end result, especially when your rifle isn't made to an established specification, at a higher price than known good options, and with absolutely no track record.
Also, the short-stroke gas piston AR configuration is inherantly flawed, in most designs. So far, only one company has made one that functions to the proper amount of reliability, and has established a militarily vouchable track record: HK. And we can't get a mil-spec 416 commercially. So stick to an internal piston/DI gun from a good company, at a better price, with a better track record.
Bookmarks