Palmetto State Armory
Noveske Rifleworks

Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > The Next Evolution in Tactical Forums > General Discussion

General Discussion Current Events, News, Politics, etc.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-18-09, 00:51
Kimbo Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 574
iTrader: (0)
Slavery in America

Had a discussion with a guy today about slavery in America. According to him the first slaves in America were the Asians in the west coast during the gold rush. Now correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the first slaves in what we now call the "United States" were Native Americans who were conquered by rival tribes? Then the next group were Africans during the early colonization of America? There were Asian slaves in the western hemisphere but they weren't technically in North America, they were in the Caribbean. This guy was very very serious when he said that the Chinese and Japanese were the first slaves in America. The Chinese were mistreated and paid very very bad wages but weren't owned by anyone and the Japanese were held against their will in detention camps during WWII? I just wanted to vent about this because I'm no history major but there has to be a line drawn with ignorance. Maybe he was saying this to spite me (I'm Asian).
  #2  
Unread 03-18-09, 00:56
jtb0311's Avatar
jtb0311 Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 395
iTrader: (0)
You are right, and he is wrong. Also of note (and at the risk of being grossly misinterpreted) 90% of the blacks who were forcibly removed from Africa ended up in South America and he Caribbean, and only 10% ended up in North America.
  #3  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:00
Gentoo's Avatar
Gentoo Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 564
iTrader: (0)
You are right and he is trolling you.
  #4  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:01
FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
FromMyColdDeadHand Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,739
iTrader: (0)
Too lazy to wiki it, but I thought it was 1619 or 1620 when a slave ship landed in Virginia. I don't even think they meant to land there or something.
__________________
Sure would be nice if gun owners fantasized about spreading the shooting sports across different demographics and popularizing responsible gun ownership and carry. -LittleLew

Ya know, I used to think the French Revolution was just a bunch of nutjob anarchists chopping the heads off of people. Now I get it.- StyerAUG

The comfort zone is the kill zone. - Dano5326
  #5  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:03
chadbag's Avatar
chadbag Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,367
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtb0311 View Post
You are right, and he is wrong. Also of note (and at the risk of being grossly misinterpreted) 90% of the blacks who were forcibly removed from Africa ended up in South America and he Caribbean, and only 10% ended up in North America.
sold by their African brothers to the slavers...
__________________
formerly known as "eguns-com"
M4Carbine required notice/disclaimer: I run eguns.com
http://www.eguns.com/www.eguns.com/Closeouts.html
"eguns.com" domain name for sale (not the webstore). Serious enquiries only.
  #6  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:09
TOrrock's Avatar
TOrrock Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 6,543
iTrader: (8)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
Too lazy to wiki it, but I thought it was 1619 or 1620 when a slave ship landed in Virginia. I don't even think they meant to land there or something.


1619, Dutch slaver pulls into Jamestown, VA to resupply and traded some of it's human cargo for water and food.

Before and after that, indentured servants and "transported" criminals and people on the wrong side of a land owner or magistrate were shipped over to VA from England, Scotland, Wales, and especially Ireland. They were slaves in all but name, and there really wasn't much difference in the way the African and European servants were treated originally. The biggest difference in records of the time differentiated them as "Christian servants" and "pagans".

It wasn't until the later 1600's that there started to be a clear dilineation between European indentured servants and Africans in North America, with the Africans getting the short end of the stick, and the start of pure chattel slavery in the English colonies.
__________________
Employee of colonialshooting.com
  #7  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:10
warpigM-4's Avatar
warpigM-4 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,109
iTrader: (2)
am I at TOS???????
  #8  
Unread 03-18-09, 01:39
bkb0000 Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 7,136
iTrader: (7)
Quote:
Originally Posted by warpigM-4 View Post
am I at TOS???????
you a racis' cracka
  #9  
Unread 03-18-09, 03:33
warpigM-4's Avatar
warpigM-4 Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,109
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
you a racis' cracka
thats me
  #10  
Unread 03-18-09, 08:53
TOrrock's Avatar
TOrrock Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 6,543
iTrader: (8)
Question has been asked and I think answered.
__________________
Employee of colonialshooting.com
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.